Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Today's Huddle debate: Buying vs leasing a car?


pstall

Recommended Posts

No matter what you're taking a risk buying a car. People tend to think you're saving money by buying but you're putting the liability in your own hands. Leasing is definitely not for losers.

That being said I buy used. 3 years old is the sweet spot for getting a good car vs the price. If you like having new cars or you can write it off as business related then leasing is the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the other thing to consider, in my opinion, is rates are so fricken low these days that buying is more affordable than in the past too. If I was you, I'd get financing through the bank and use "cash" at the dealer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for some background. 99% I do NOT like payments either. My old Montero was totalled about a month or so ago. I knocked out some debt with the ins money. That vehicle was paid off.

So now, I don't have cash on hand to buy a car outright. Maybe put some down on a used sure.

But if I go lease, I will drive all of a 2-3 miles a day to park at the light rail. I will drive on the weekends for sure but I won't come close to 1k a month in miles.

I don't view a car as investment. I got lucky with the Montero. Took it off a buddies hands for 150 a month and it was paid off in 2 yrs 0%. He need some help and so did I so it was a win/win.

Diff deal now. Wife is working full time again and is back to 8-5 land.

Ok, I'll take 5k for mine or $450 a month for a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends what you budget per month for car payments or repair bills. Buying something old could mean repair bills that add up to what new car payments would be. Pay a qualified tech to check out something you find on Craigslist before you buy.

If you're well to do leasing a BMW with free maintainance and getting new every 3 makes sense. Especially with the value it holds.

If you're trying to keep the payments down and you want a car for a long long time go Honda, Toyota or Huyndai. Get some low, low factory financing and go long.

Remember gas is $4 a gallon and buying a domestic SUV is dumb. :cool:

Don't lease or buy something like a PT Cruiser, these things lose value like you can't believe. Remember before the Domestic automaker crash Chrysler finance would not even lease their own vehicles. They didn't want the lumps of poo back! :lol:

A nice Ceritfied used car can work as well, most come with 100k warranties and you can still get good financing.

Good luck and post a pic of the new ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...