Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Palmer's fate coming down to a test of wills


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

From Clark Judge at CBS: One man's opinion

Judge - citing "a GM with a club that could use a quarterback" - says Head Coach Marvin Lewis is firmly convinced, as are others, that there's no way Palmer will ever play for the Bengals again. His preference would be to get at least something for him rather than just losing him with nothing to gain.

On the flipside is Bengals owner Mike Brown. He's so far been unwilling to budge, at least in part because he fears the precedent that it might set. What happens if other players start making the same demands? Given how crappy the Bengals have been (and for how long a time) that'd seem to be a distinct possibility.

Brown, of course, has the final say, but I expect Lewis will do all he can to convince him of the wisdom of parting with Palmer voluntarily.

As a side note, stuff like this always makes me wonder if Mike Brown actually believes he's good at what he does; or if, perhaps, he knows that he's an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you trade the rights to a retired player?

That is a good question. And I think you can bc even if he retires the Bengals retain his rights until his contract expires.

But who would trade for a retired player?? I guess that team would have assurances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brown faced a decision like this once before.

Boomer Esaiason made a similar demand, though less publicly than Palmer. Brown responded by drafting David Klingler in the first round and then letting go of Esaiason the next season.

He could conceivably go the same route this year, or just do it all at once. I suspect Palmer being so public about this has hurt the chances of that though. He might have been wiser to keep all this in-house and thus not threaten Brown's ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember the details of Favre's stuff with the Pack/Jets/Vikings with his retirement. Someone with a better memory might be able to fill us in there.

I think that what might happen is Brown forces him into retirement, then the Bengals talk to him and explain that they will trade him if they can find a trade partner, then try to gouge some QB-desperate team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you trade the rights to a retired player?

I suspect you can. I know you can release them. Washington did it with Deion Sanders a few years back.

Sanders wanted to join the Raiders, but Marty Schottenheimer (then with the Chargers) prevented it by putting in a waiver claim. San Diego was higher in the waiver order than Oakland.

Since Sanders and Schottenheimer were notoriously at odds, Deion chose to stay retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

I suspect you can. I know you can release them. Washington did it with Deion Sanders a few years back.

Sanders wanted to join the Raiders, but Marty Schottenheimer (then with the Chargers) prevented it by putting in a waiver claim. San Diego was higher in the waiver order than Oakland.

Since Sanders and Schottenheimer were notoriously at odds, Deion chose to stay retired.

Yeah but can you trade him after he retires?? I think you can trade his rights. Do you know Scot???

Link to comment

Practically speaking, they'd be wiser to send him out of conference, and Lord knows there are some QB needy teams in the NFC.

As a side note, there's no real evidence to say "yes or no" within the article itself, but the "GM with a club that needs a quarterback" could very easily be a guy that works in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tiki Barber just came back after 4 years but was still under contract. They said they would release him, yes?

If Palmer retires it might take that long for the Bungles to do the same.

Also, if we take Cam in the draft, I really don't think we will make a play for Palmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think a change of scenery is exactly what palmer needs. New coaching staff, young nucleus, and a chance to start are exactly what he needs.

Edit: I know he has always been a starter, but with that kind of money saved, he probably would stay retired if a team wanted him strictly as a bench warmer mentor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...