Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Satellite Radio and the future


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

I am looking at buying an XM receiver for my car. I went to bust buy to get an installed price. I can get a descent one installed, parts and labor for around $220. Then of course I am going to have to pay for the XM service.

Also, a tidbit on the service... My dad let his subscription expire last year, and the sales person from XM called him to offer $499 lifetime service. He went ahead and got it, but again it was $500. I called XM and they offered me the same deal. So I would ultimately be paying around $750 for sat radio. I really would like to have it, as I drive around 4000+ miles a month. It gets annoying trying to dick around with local radio stations in different cities.

Does anyone have any knowledge about the direction of subscription based radio? I dont want to spend $100's on something that will be obsolete in a couple years.

I can use Pandora, however I am extremely dependent on my phone for work, and Pandora messes with the battery/functionality of the phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going anywhere, Stern is there cash cow and he just resigned not to long ago.

**all though he is suing them now**

Most of there other personality's have also resigned.

I don't see it going anywhere

They might get some competition from free Internet based radio, until they also start charging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought a receiver from ebay and installed for about 125. I would try to save a little there. But I wouldn't change anything if I could go back in time. I love satellite radio and am glad I made the change. Also who in the 21st century listens to fm radio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking about getting rid of the satellite radio. Listening on line used to be free. Now it isn't. The merger took place 4 years ago and they are still two seprate companies. I have XM and if I want the "best of Sirius" I have to pay for that. Just recently I changed my settings and they charged me a $5 "change fee." And now Stern is suing the company. And don't get me started on the lack of original programming on Howard 100 and 101. It is a joke now.

Maybe I should just get rid of it and use Pandora and podcasts as my car radio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I have installed XM recievers on 2 cars in the past myself. However, what inclines me to have it professionally done is the fact that they can

A) hardwire the power

B) install the FM modulator (which is seperate from the built in one, this one installs directly onto the attena coming from my car radio and it essentially disables FM, and only allows the XM Broadcast...DEF worth the $22)

C) Custom mount my reciever exactly where I want it. They will likely have to create a special mount, because the one that comes with the reciever SUX.

D) take away the 2-4 hour headache...$70 aint bad to have someone else do it for me!

Also, I met the installer while I was shopping. He is def qualified, and he knows whats up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I discovered XM in 2005 when I bought my Tahoe. One of the many deciding factors when I bought my new Tahoe last year was XM (now Sirius XM). We had the dealer install it in my wife's car in 2006.

Would never go back to terrestrial radio. Most of the channels Sirius offered are now on XM, with the exception of a few of the premium channels which I don't subscribe to (NFL games being one of them). Anyway, I'm on a quarterly payment plan for both cars and it runs me about $78 per quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No doubt.  I was at the game watching it and it looked like a fly ball to the infield.  It got in the air and just hung up.  XL tracked it like a shortstop.  
    • You need to go outside and get some fresh air.
    • Sorry, I don't get the "mental" thing at all. If his football IQ was as low as you say it is, then he wouldn't be out there blocking as well as he is.  It is quite possible that he's been pressing due to not really being in the flow of the game because Bryce doesn't look for him on the regular. His strength, at the moment, seems to be as a mismatch in the slot on crossers and slants in my opinion,and for whatever reason (maybe height) Bryce is more likely going to chuck it to the sidelines. So, in a sense, maybe Legette and Bryce aren't a good pairing, and that gives the appearance that Legette is not all there. Lord knows that Bryce doesn't seem to be able to hit receivers in stride so they can maximize YAC. But anyway...all that being said, I thought that X would be more than just a possession type of guy. So we'll see where it goes from here. I'm not like some, who appear not to see the value in a guy who can kill you like that, and kill you just as well as guys that do their best work on the outside, but, X is going to have to be able to consistently hands-catch on the run and separate better at the top of the route if he really wants to unlock his potential as an all-around receiver. If Bryce could consistently and accurately hit receivers, especially in seams on the slants and crossers, it would open up Legette and the offense. Just my opinion, but I think he causes all the receivers to press to varying degrees, and causes the coaches to call plays that have built-in limitations, but I could be wrong about that.
×
×
  • Create New...