Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock Warming to Cam Newton


mav1234

Recommended Posts

Gabbert's actual wonderlic at the combine was 31, supposedly. Sounds like he's in the ideal range, not Cam Newton. ;)

As a note, 11 of the last 15 superbowl winning QBs have had over 25 on the wonderlic. 2 of the other 4 (johnson/warner) are unknown. 2 are Favre and Dilfer.

In the last decade, the only QB to play in the Superbowl with a known wonderlic below a 25 was McNabb, who didn't win (and some might even unreasonably "blame" him for that).

More interestingly is to look at the average wonderlic of starting QBs in the NFL. This is what I am doing.

I will say this: I've not seen a clear correlation between increasing wonderlic and success. As Tee said, there appears to be a sweet spot.

I am interested in your results. I will also say this. When is the last time a scrambling QB won the super bowl? I am not saying a QB that can also run.. like Aaron Rodgers. I don't consider Aaron Rodgers a scrambling QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, that may be what it means to you......but that doesn't make it true. If you were to make a list of the greatest QBs of the last 3 decades......Cam's score would be higher than plenty of the guys on the list.

Wonderlic is garbage for the most part if you want to talk about who can play football pending someone didn't score a 8 or something.

They can play football, but how fast can they learn the playbook?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure Alex Smith ever learned the playbook, or how to read an NFL defense.

Same goes for Matt Leinart. He just wanted to party and be famous.. be an 'icon'... not study the playbook. If Leinart would have dedicated himself to football, he could have been a solid pro. This is what worries me about Newton. If we draft Newton, I will stand behind him and hope like hell that he keeps himself dedicated to football. But, as of now, call me extremely pessimistic about his dedication once he gets paid.

I am not going to convince you that Gabbert is the right pick, just like you won't convince me that Newton is the right guy. But whoever we end up with, I hope we can all get behind our QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same goes for Matt Leinart. He just wanted to party and be famous.. be an 'icon'... not study the playbook. If Leinart would have dedicated himself to football, he could have been a solid pro.

No doubt. And that is the most fair criticism on Cam's character in my opinion. Does he want to be a superstar football player, or just a superstar. I think he will work his butt off. But if I didn't think that I wouldn't want him. But I think it is a fair question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you be an icon without succeeding at something first? Nobody cares about a guy who is out of the league after 3-4 years, so I believe the icon and entertainer comment just puts more pressure on Cam to work hard and succeed. That's a good thing.

I also believe Nawrocki's comments are a good thing for Cam Newton, because that's pure motivation for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can play football, but how fast can they learn the playbook?

again, that isn't something the wonderlic is going to tell you.

wonderlic is overblown diddly poo.

you can claim a high wonderlic means you are smarter and can learn a playbook faster.

Wonderlic scores don't prove who is a smarter football player and how players learn playbooks.......really, it just shows how different people do on a very small specialized type of test taking. The lines people draw from that don't mean as much as suggested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, that isn't something the wonderlic is going to tell you.

wonderlic is overblown diddly poo.

you can claiming a high wonderlic means you are smarter and can learn a playbook faster. Wonderlic scores don't prove who is a smarter football player and how players learn playbooks.......

Why do you think they make the players take these tests?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think they make the players take these tests?

b/c it gives a very very small glance into a trait.

They use that small glimpse they get and use it with all the other information they have in evaluating guys.

as far as the wonderlic standing alone as a single piece of information.....it is drastly overblown......just like most of the combine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b/c it gives a very very small glance into a trait.

They use that small glimpse they get and use it with all the other information they have in evaluating guys.

as far as the wonderlic standing alone as a single piece of information.....it is drastly overblown......just like most of the combine.

Exactly.

I wonder what is more important to GM's, the Wonderlic or the underwear parade? :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you be an icon without succeeding at something first? Nobody cares about a guy who is out of the league after 3-4 years, so I believe the icon and entertainer comment just puts more pressure on Cam to work hard and succeed. That's a good thing.

I also believe Nawrocki's comments are a good thing for Cam Newton, because that's pure motivation for him.

Well said :thumbsup: I think you are 100% right about him using the negative comments as motivation on the field. Hell we saw how he handled the adversity all year long. I am willing to bet he is motivated by doubters,he seems to have that mentality to elevate his game when his back is against the wall and I like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...