Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did a NFL breakdown since 2002...


beckersteen

Recommended Posts

I keep track of this and update every year. Thought I'd share it with you. Things like this interest me:

AFC: 1187-1115-2; 5 Super Bowls

-AFCS: 312-264; 2 AFC Championships; 1 Super Bowl

IND: 109-35; 9 Playoff Appearances; 2 AFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

TEN: 77-67; 4 Playoff Appearances

JAX: 71-73; 2 Playoff Appearances

HOU: 55-89;

-AFCE: 305-271; 3 AFC Championships; 2 Super Bowls

NE: 110-34; 7 Playoff Appearances; 3 AFC Championships; 2 Super Bowls

NYJ: 72-72; 5 Playoff Appearances

MIA: 64-80; 1 Playoff Appearance

BUF: 59-85;

-AFCN: 289-285-2; 3 AFC Championships; 2 Super Bowls

PIT: 93-50-1; 6 Playoff Appearances; 3 AFC Championships; 2 Super Bowls

BAL: 84-62; 5 Playoff Appearances

CIN: 63-80-1; 2 Playoff Appearances

CLE: 51-92; 1 Playoff Appearance

-AFCW: 281-295; 1 AFC Championship

SD: 88-56; 5 Playoff Appearances

DEN: 78-66; 3 Playoff Appearances

KC: 67-77; 3 Playoff Appearances

OAK: 48-96; 1 Playoff Appearance; 1 AFC Championship

NFC: 1115-1187-2; 4 Super Bowls

-NFCE: 308-267-1; 2 NFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

PHI: 91-52-1; 7 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship

DAL: 78-66; 4 Playoff Appearances

NYG: 79-65; 5 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

WAS: 60-84; 2 Playoff Appearances

-NFCS: 297-278-1; 3 NFC Championships; 2 Super Bowls

ATL: 77-66-1; 4 Playoff Appearances

NO: 77-67; 3 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

CAR: 73-71; 3 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship

TB: 70-74; 3 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

-NFCN: 269-307; 2 NFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

GB: 84-60; 6 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship; 1 Super Bowl

MIN: 74-70; 3 Playoff Appearances

CHI: 64-70; 3 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship

DET: 37-107

-NFCW: 241-335; 2 NFC Championships

SEA: 74-70; 6 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship

ARI: 57-87; 2 Playoff Appearances; 1 NFC Championship

SF: 56-89; 1 Playoff Appearance

STL: 54-90; 2 Playoff Appearances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...