Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Newton wasnt in the draft who'd you pick


ncmonzta

Recommended Posts

Or score on his own. Our offense sure as fug can't.

Honestly how many points can he really score 2-3 on specialteams maybe 2-3 pick 6 and that's a rookie of the year type numbers. We need more then a player who can be negated by not passing his way or kicking the ball out of bounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly how many points can he really score 2-3 on specialteams maybe 2-3 pick 6 and that's a rookie of the year type numbers. We need more then a player who can be negated by not passing his way or kicking the ball out of bounds.

Taking away half the field from your opposing offense's passing game and eliminating their #1 WR is a pretty big deal, and I would guess somewhere in the neighborhood of minus 6.5 pts for your opponent, per game. That's important enough.

Add to that ill-conceived throws in his direction that end up as INT/TDs or points your way - say, 3.5 ppg or so over the course of a season.

Then, he's a return guy who's good for field position and likely to score a TD or two for a season average of plus 1.5 for the good guys...

I honestly think Deion Sanders was, himself, worth about 10 points a game in his prime.

I doubt Peterson is Deion Sanders, but a uniquely athletic shutdown corner/return man can make immediate difference on the scoreboard, don't think otherwise, and if Peterson is anything close to that, he's worth a #1 overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With TEs, Rbs, and 4-5 wr sets you can win with out going to you 1st or 2nd wr option all the time.

My point was that the argument of throwing to the other side of the field to negate a CB is overly simplistic at best. More targets in the passing game means the CB position is an even bigger need, not less of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with Newton in the draft I'd take DAREUS

He is NFL ready,has no baggage,will be an all-pro

for many years. Will cause turnovers and shorten

the field. No arrest record for theft,doesn't lie or cheat.

Loves to destroy QB's named Ryan and Brees.Is a leader.

No brainer here, we need to get Dareus not wait years on

a developmental QB with baggage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...