Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ridiculous Names

TerriblePizza

By TerriblePizza,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

boo7382 Newbie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

reminds me of the story about the girl named Le-a (pronounced Ledasha)

My cousin just named his newborn daughter Harper Joseph, still not sure what to think of it

Harper is a big name in my family. My uncle, all his brothers and his sons are all H's.

Harlan Hank Hamilton Hunter Hayden and then Harlans sons are Harper and Henry

My friends have what some people like to call "rich names". Have a best friend named Palmer who has 2 younger brothers. One is named Harding and one is named Young. Yeah, his name is Young....or joven as I like to call him.

I have lots of friends with double names, Mary Elizabeth, Mary Mitchell, Jane Andrews, the list goes on.

Most of these are family names, just like mine. No one ever tells me my name is weird, just that it is unique and they think it is pretty.

On another note, this thread reminds me of this video:

Fri'Chickenisha LOLZ :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
Posted

Yep, Red, Blue & Green are all boys.

It's pretty rediculous, they're getting ready to have another kid, I wonder what they'll name that one. Crayola, Magenta, Cyan, Gray, Brown...

tell them that I suggest Wic or Stamp

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boo7382 Newbie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

I know a guy that has 5 kids & they're names are all colors except for one. He has Red, Blue, Violet, Green and Dixie Lee.

Is he from WVA? My boss is from there and says everyone has Lee somewhere in their names.

Oddly enough, that's my brother's name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
g5jamz Newbie

g5jamz

Posted
Posted

Strangely...I really didn't see a lot of the nutty names until late 80s/90s.

Buddy right down road was names John. Couple of Charles(s). Lawrence. Emily. Barbara.

Did the letter Q sponsor an NAACP event in the 90s? /joke

It probably stems from the fact that a lot of southern raised African Americans simply took on the names of the slave owners and it kept. After a while, people wanted to revert back to their stolen heritage and adjusted accordingly. I don't blame them. I do blame people for not properly "researching" and just coming up with a name that's absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LifeisaGarden Newbie

LifeisaGarden

Posted
Posted

Growing up, I thought the kids on my street had strange names. There was a Dee Dee, Shonnie, Lydia, Gabriel and a few others I cant remember right now. My name is Glenda, I always thought that was strange when I was a kid because I never met anyone else named Glenda until I became an adult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...