Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Sex Question

Darth Biscuit

By Darth Biscuit,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Panthers_Lover Newbie

Panthers_Lover

Posted
Posted

interesting. I am the opposite. But I have my reasons.

But being pushed around and controlled= awesome.

To a point ... just learning (after all this time) to not panic if my arms aren't free (deep seeded reasons I won't go into now). Testament to how comfortable I feel with the guy I'm with right now. See, you can teach an old dog new tricks! And I'm lovin' it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

To be good, it takes a certain skill set for both men and women. I disagree with Boo (and maybe you) that all a guy has to do is stick his tongue down there and move it around. That's just the basics, and sometimes the basics are so boring as to not be effective. A truly skilled man does so much more than that. I can say that only a few of the many men I've been with are truly skilled in that area ... they do look at it merely as a way of "warming" me up, when if they took their time and got into a bit more, they would get so much more out of me in the long run. The few who know, have reaped the best rewards, and I don't mean merely "reciprocating."

(if I'm picking this up correctly on best rewards)...so those other things aren't out of the question later down the road based on either trust or after realizing this person has more to offer than just early boyfriend status...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miaoww Newbie

Miaoww

Posted
Posted

I don't get how you DON'T. I mean its gotta be really awkward if you don't want to.

Do you tell him before?

Do you wait until it happens and then with a mouth full say "whua ca i spi thi" and then expect him to quickly point out a sink/trashcan/some sort of place to put it while hes in the post offage state? I think not.

Just better for everyone for you to suck it up and just do it. and I mean that literally.

Ha, you're a keeper, boo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

To be good, it takes a certain skill set for both men and women.

My exwife actually taught me how to do it right. Or at least how she liked it. About the only positive that came from my first marriage.

IMO, like anything else, it takes practice. And a willingness to do it. And plenty and plenty of practice. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers_Lover Newbie

Panthers_Lover

Posted
Posted

(if I'm picking this up correctly on best rewards)...so those other things aren't out of the question later down the road based on either trust or after realizing this person has more to offer than just early boyfriend status...?

The best rewards I'm talking about here are purely sexual. ... If a man takes the time to become skilled at giving oral sex (and not only that, but that's the topic at hand here), and provides me with an experience that is more than merely the obligatory "warming" me up, then the rewards would be realized in the form of my becoming more engaged in the entire sexual experience beyond what might "normally" be expected. I'm all for a good quickie every once in a while, but to me, the sexual experience can and should be more than a lick here, a suck there ... fug a little while, and be done ....

Hummmm ... I fear I'm not making myself clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
Posted

i think a man's willingness(at least mine) is also affected by the woman's ability to climax. i've had all kinds from one end of the spectrum to the other. one girl had never gotten off even when using toys. i did everything i knew for her, and researched to learn more. nothing. so it seemed pointless. another ALWAYS had multiples. i had no problem putting on scuba gear for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat Newbie

Cat

Posted
Posted

i think a man's willingness(at least mine) is also affected by the woman's ability to climax. i've had all kinds from one end of the spectrum to the other. one girl had never gotten off even when using toys. i did everything i knew for her, and researched to learn more. nothing. so it seemed pointless. another ALWAYS had multiples. i had no problem putting on scuba gear for her.

People are different. One of my best friends has never climaxed during sex. Pretty much only happens when she is solo. So she doesn't find sex that fun. Guys think she is playing hard to get but they are mistaken. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers_Lover Newbie

Panthers_Lover

Posted
Posted

i think a man's willingness(at least mine) is also affected by the woman's ability to climax. i've had all kinds from one end of the spectrum to the other. one girl had never gotten off even when using toys. i did everything i knew for her, and researched to learn more. nothing. so it seemed pointless. another ALWAYS had multiples. i had no problem putting on scuba gear for her.

There was a time ... long ago ... when I was like that. Could only do it alone. Then, I "took charge" of my body, opened up (literally and figuratively, but mostly mentally), and let myself go. Now, I always have multiples ... if my partner is willing to go beyond slam-bam-thank-you-ma'm. If he's not, then it's "next" ....

It's more about the woman's mindset than what anyone can "do" to her ... though a patient and skillful partner can earn a woman's trust, and she can change.

Lord, it's amazing what I'll say on an anonymous board. (Those of you who know me IRL, you might have to just skip my posts in this thread if necessary.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Martin · Posted

      He gets the blame because his role as the QB is to make plays, help the team score more points and elevate players around him. He does none of that. Just because he didn’t massively mess up doesn’t mean he wasn’t a reason for the loss. The bar some of you have for Bryce is incredibly low.
    • strato
      Canales is holding us back

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Verge
      The Hall of Fame case for two different NFC South quarterbacks

      By Verge · Posted

      Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
×
×
  • Create New...