Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Women who like the extra slim/slender body type...


Jase

Recommended Posts

uhhhh.....doesn't that describe you?

most of the time... last year I put on a good amount of muscle, thinking that I looked better, and now that I've gotten skinnier again, all I hear is that I look better skinny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you put on weight(muscle or fat) it gets packed on around your root too making what is seen smaller. its all still there though. it just can't go inside a girl cuz its stuck inside you.

so women that like very slim guys are size queens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you put on weight(muscle or fat) it gets packed on around your root too making what is seen smaller. its all still there though. it just can't go inside a girl cuz its stuck inside you.

so women that like very slim guys are size queens.

Interesting theory... however the only women who would take notice of this are my wife and my two mistresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of the time... last year I put on a good amount of muscle, thinking that I looked better, and now that I've gotten skinnier again, all I hear is that I look better skinny.

Maybe thats just for your body type. There are definitely guys who look better skinny.

I don't go for a certain body type....I like em all. My ex bf was a tall, skinny dude but he still had muscle on him. Something about the tall skinny thing that I find extremely sexay.

I also like the fuller, more muscular, broad chest...but hey who doesn't.

The only thing I seem to be uniform with is the height thing. Just never been intrigued by the short guys, but then again, "tall" for me is probably not "tall" for most people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In May of 2026, it looks like a challenging schedule...and it probably is.  I rarely listen to the "strength of schedule" conversations that light up social media this time of year. Each year teams improve and decline. I think there's chunks of the year we need to take care of business and the week 5 bye is not desired.  I do think if we don't hit the bye week at 3-1, it's going to be a major uphill battle given the schedule in front of us. This season falls on three people, regardless of schedule strength: Canales, Bryce, Evero.  Canales: Finally can truly coach all aspects of the team and not focus with gameday prep for OC duties anymore. He drives the bus and needs to get these guys in position to win each week. There's no way vets come in and put it on the line every week to watch our QB sh!t the bed (See: SF game last year). Bryce: Despite everyone's obsession with thinking Bryce is a guaranteed extension, I think this year will truly be his "prove it" year. If he comes out the way he has the past three years, I really don't see how vets and coaches can continue to put him under center long-term. He might play out that fifth year as the starter, but I think next offseason his long-term replacement is found. I also think there's no excuses with the weapons and commitment we've made on offense to insulate him with every possible weapon.  Evero: Best personnel he's had since he's been here...no excuses. Figure out how to blitz effectively. Figure out how to use CBs whose strengths are press/man. Figure out how to utilize a talented front-7 to get the hell of the field. Outside of FS and maybe....maybe ILB, there are few weaknesses on this unit. 
    • Canales can never get his teams ready in the first week of the season so far. Hope that changes or Ben Johnson is going to take his azz to school. 
×
×
  • Create New...