Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free Agents in new CBA= players4/5/6 years


Kurb

Recommended Posts

Reps

According to peter king, if they are currently undercontract they are unaffected.

Which makes no sense, but thats peter king...

Relax, folks. All players with four years or more of credited service AND WHO ARE UNSIGNED NOW would be free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

josephperson Panthers would have 19 UFAs under ('09) rules, incl. DeAngelo Williams, James Anderson, Charles Johnson, Dante Rosario, Ryan Kalil (tagged).

basically it's just rolling back the clock to '09 and everyone who should have been able to become UFAs will become that. in some areas this could hurt, but it has the same effect (more or less) on other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me do the math. We're $70 million under cap, we require spend 93 percent of our cap... And free agent market will be floaded with talent? You know what it means??? Shopping spree, bitches!

signing all of our UFAs

Cam Newton(even with the cap)

extending Jon Beason

Barry Coefield

bye bye 70 million dollars. I hope we front load all of those contracts too. Cap heaven. Richardson's salary purge sure sucked but hopefully we forget about that quick and win games again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So answer the question. Why did Chark and Hurst have the same metrics (go look them up, I did... and one was actually worse in LA) with Justin Herbert? Why did Mingo have the same metrics with Dak? You're right, there is a common denominator, just not the one you're trying to make.  Why could DJ Moore get open with Bridgewater, Allen, Cam 2.0, Darnold, Baker, Williams, Bagent? I'll answer the question for you - because he is a good WR unlike Chark/Hurst/Mingo. 
    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
×
×
  • Create New...