Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bree Boyce: Miss South Carolina's 110-pound weight loss

jasonluckydog

By jasonluckydog,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

jasonluckydog Grand Master

jasonluckydog

Posted
Posted

http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/07/bree-boyce-miss-south-carolinas-110-pound-weight-loss.html

The Miss America pageant may still be quite a ways off -- January 2012, and counting down the days -- but we may already have a front runner. And by "may" we mean "definitely."

Recently crowned Miss South Carolina Bree Boyce appeared on Tuesday's (July 12) episode of "Good Morning America" to talk about her recent victory and her stunning 110-pound weight loss.

Speaking with host Robin Roberts, the 22-year-old says that it was just the classic combo of exercise and a good diet that helped her drop the weight after her doctor warned her about her health.

"When I was younger, there [was] all the yo-yo diets, the fad diets that everyone wanted to try," she says. "I originally started on an at Atkins-type diet, cutting out all carbs, but I found quickly that you could lose the weight, but you couldn't keep it off. We're only human. We enjoy carbs."

Boyce also came to the defense of First Lady Michelle Obama, who's apparently been getting flack for eating at the new DC outpost of burger joint Shake Shack -- despite her advocacy for healthy eating.

"She may be First Lady, and she may be promoting 'Let's Move,' but we're all human," says Boyce, laughing. "She probably worked it off right after she ate it."

VIDEO in link

SOUTHCAROLINA.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...