Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

July 31 Afternoon Practice.


Kurb

Recommended Posts

I never said any of that was definitive, :lol: you lil girls are so defensive about the rookies, you just had to step right up and say something before understanding what I said.

If his comment is true (we dont know if it is or not) then . . to me. . . it means. . . they are fatter than they should be for the average pro. . . because. . . . Fat takes up more space than muscle. . . and therefor. . . makes you look bigger.

:rofl:

You know it IS possible that they look bigger than he expected because they have more muscle..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said any of that was definitive, :lol: you lil girls are so defensive about the rookies, you just had to step right up and say something before understanding what I said.

If his comment is true (we dont know if it is or not) then . . to me. . . it means. . . they are fatter than they should be for the average pro. . . because. . . . Fat takes up more space than muscle. . . and therefor. . . makes you look bigger.

:rofl:

You and I interpreted it differently. Not a problem. Without being there neither one of us can know for sure. BTW I don't take to name calling very well. I will respect you as long as you do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and I interpreted it differently. Not a problem. Without being there neither one of us can know for sure. BTW I don't take to name calling very well. I will respect you as long as you do the same.

It's a lil rough to maintain when 10 people including the "village idiot" are trying to tell you that youre stupid :)

But ya, my fault, ur right I shouldnt generalize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...