Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Netflix Recommendation - SHERLOCK


Zod

Recommended Posts

I assume you're talking about the new BBC show. I watched season 1 last Fall, and it was really good. Glad to see they finally made a season two. I read that the plans to continue were delayed. I hope they make more.

season two was just as good as one.

you can still watch the third show here

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00m5wm7

I wouldn't. Missing the other two will screw up the ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I really enjoyed Season 1. I think the actor performing as Watson is doing a great job. He is Bilbo Baggins in the upcoming Hobbit release.

Glad to read here that there is a Season 2. Guess I'll wait til Netflix adds it to streaming. C'mon, hurry up Netflix.

BTW, I don't understand the grief Netflix receives. They aren't the ones raising the costs or taking their shows off of streaming. Blame the studios. Netflix created a working video streaming market (PCs & Roku in the beginning).

$8 to stream anything they offer. I've rewatched recently the entire Xfiles, Frasier, Cheers series. I would never pay $100 or more to buy the DVDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...