Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we stop with the knee jerk reactions? (and my observations to the game)

lightsout

By lightsout,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

We have a subpar game and people freak the hell out. "We shouldn't be picking a starter," "tonight was the coaching," "waa waaa waaa."

Chill. Look, it is the preseason. It is a scrimmage. It means NOTHING other than seeing what your team can do in game situations. It is also a time to try things you haven't done. I was only able to watch almost the first half, but here is my thoughts after seeing that and looking at the stats after that point.

-Defense (front 7). Didn't look great. But why? Last week, we saw a good bit of blitzing. Last night, not a lot at all. Why is that? Well, one thought is that it is the preseason and they don't want to see how much they can stop a team as much as evaluate the DL and see what they can do on their own. The reason Miami was able to run the ball so well was because we weren't blitzing at all. When we did blitz a little in the 1st quarter, we held them to very minimal gains. Was pleased on the goal line stand (well, almost) in the 1st quarter. Took Miami 5 plays and a penalty to get in.

-Defense (secondary). Not great by any stretch, from what I saw. Receivers getting too much separation. Not what you want to see. Didn't really see enough of the game to evaluate this.

-Cam. First pass was good. The out-route to Shockey at the start of the 2nd drive was a great pass. Other than that, still looks like a rookie at times. The first run was exciting. It is so good to have that element in our QB play now. Receivers couldn't get open though. I will say that. Mostly due to no Steve Smith to draw attention. I give Cam's performance a little worse grade than last week. C+ to B-, at best.

-Run game. Turrible. Just turrible (from what I saw).

That is all I saw. I don't think coaching was the problem. I think it is simply doing different things because it is preseason. You have a plan of what you want accomplished from each player. You're not necessarily playing these games to win them (although it is always nice).

Flame away, I know it is coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Last night's D played zone about as well as the Madden AI.

Agreed. One thing I LOVED though was having Thomas Davis back. I saw at one point a disguised cover 2 (looked just like a cover three pre-snap). Davis took off at the snap of the ball to the flat, where he met Bush, who dropped the pass. But Davis got there in a hurry. Very cool to see. Very creative. Something we're not used to seeing around here, as far as how it was set up.

Our corners are just....:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jim stone Newbie

jim stone

Posted
Posted

Seems to me smitty has trouble adjusting to the regular season after lounging through the preseasons. (Smitty always finds a way not to play preseasons). Look ahead? OK I go out two games. If we beat the steelers on home ground, I'll eat all my words. Coach Tomlin always plays to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
  • Author
Posted

yeah it wasn't a bad assessment of the team, especially the front 7.

And just to elaborate further, our DL got pushed around way too much. I mean, I know it is easy because you're out-numbered by the OL and FB. But you should at least be able to cause a pile every once in a while. Don't rely on the linebackers to make plays out of nothing. That being said, our LB didn't really get down hill as fast as they need to every play either. It all comes back to the DL and in particular our DTs. Need to be more consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Deangelo only carried the ball three times in the first half. All of those were even in the first quarter. So I disagree that the run game looked terrible. If this was a regular season game there would have been much more balance in the offensive gameplan. The offensive line and everybody suffered from the constant pressure that was brought due to our lack of a rushing threat simply because we more interested in testing Cam than giving reps to Deangelo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
footballisasport Newbie

footballisasport

Posted
Posted

We have a subpar game and people freak the hell out. "We shouldn't be picking a starter," "tonight was the coaching," "waa waaa waaa."

Chill. Look, it is the preseason. It is a scrimmage. It means NOTHING other than seeing what your team can do in game situations. It is also a time to try things you haven't done. I was only able to watch almost the first half, but here is my thoughts after seeing that and looking at the stats after that point.

-Defense (front 7). Didn't look great. But why? Last week, we saw a good bit of blitzing. Last night, not a lot at all. Why is that? Well, one thought is that it is the preseason and they don't want to see how much they can stop a team as much as evaluate the DL and see what they can do on their own. The reason Miami was able to run the ball so well was because we weren't blitzing at all. When we did blitz a little in the 1st quarter, we held them to very minimal gains. Was pleased on the goal line stand (well, almost) in the 1st quarter. Took Miami 5 plays and a penalty to get in.

-Defense (secondary). Not great by any stretch, from what I saw. Receivers getting too much separation. Not what you want to see. Didn't really see enough of the game to evaluate this.

-Cam. First pass was good. The out-route to Shockey at the start of the 2nd drive was a great pass. Other than that, still looks like a rookie at times. The first run was exciting. It is so good to have that element in our QB play now. Receivers couldn't get open though. I will say that. Mostly due to no Steve Smith to draw attention. I give Cam's performance a little worse grade than last week. C+ to B-, at best.

-Run game. Turrible. Just turrible (from what I saw).

That is all I saw. I don't think coaching was the problem. I think it is simply doing different things because it is preseason. You have a plan of what you want accomplished from each player. You're not necessarily playing these games to win them (although it is always nice).

Flame away, I know it is coming.

If what u observed is on point, then the coach now have a lot to work with and fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...