Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD


Sword

Recommended Posts

You can evaluate them on what you saw, unless you don't think you are knowledgeable to to take everything into consideration and evaluate their play.

I can but it is a flawed scenario.

I can watch Man A fight a homeless man

I can watch Man B fight a trained MMA fighter

No point in claiming Man A looked better.....meaningless. Unless you have been pimping Man A and knocking Man B....and it supports your stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many failed third down or stalled drives = one turnover?

Moore also gave his team a chance at a TD, Cam barely crossed the 50

Lots of things to consider...

Only the true Cam apologists think it's even close.

If would haves and wishes had some value we'd all be rich. Yes moore moved the ball better but he Turned the ball over and gave up points to a dormant offense otherwise. That turnover erases all the good he might have done and put them right back at 0. Yes he would have threw a td but it didnt happen. I'm not giving him credit for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alex Smith looked better then Vick we all know who the better QB is.

Cam played significantly better than Vick....who has already been penciled in to lead his team to a Superbowl.

preseason game 2....is just that. preseason game 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam played significantly better than Vick....who has already been penciled in to lead his team to a Superbowl.

preseason game 2....is just that. preseason game 2.

I agree not to mention the fact Cam had Bad starting field position and less chances due to Miami going up and down the field on our Def.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't you doing a 180 from last week? You didn't give credit for Cam throwing good passes at Lafell in the end zone or the drops by Edwards and Clowny. Now you want to bring up drops?

I gave Cam plenty of credit for the great ball he threw that Armanti dropped. I said it was the best pass he's ever thrown and gave me hope for the future if he could make that more consistent. I also said Clowney was neutral to me because the ball could have been a tad behind him allowing the defender to make a play but it also could have been a drop.

I also said the first pass to LaFell in the endzone was a good ball but was the victim of PI/good defense.

The second ball was on the ground so he doesn't deserve anything for that.

Maybe you should read my posts instead of assuming what they say. I doubt you lack the reading comprehension necessary to understand them though.

If would haves and wishes had some value we'd all be rich. Yes moore moved the ball better but he Turned fhe ball over and gave up points to a dormant offense otherwise. That turnover erases all the good he might have done and put them right back at 0. Yes he would have threw a td but it didnt happen. I'm not giving him credit for that.

So you are saying that good throws that are incompletions don't count? I need to reevaluate Cam's first game then.

I gave him credit for his great throw that Armanti dropped yet you acknowledge that you won't give Moore credit for a good throw that would have resulted in a TD and I'm the biased one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh okay

The only reason Cam has less than a 50% completion percentage, constantly throws off his back foot, is scared of a blitz, and can't lead the team down the field is that I'm a hater.

Got it.

With all those so called mistakes you noticed, did u noticed that Cam still never made a fumble and gave the opposing team a free gift like Matt Moore did? But I guess that's no biggie cause it's just a PRESEASON GAME...It would only a biggie if Cam did it.

It's good to see u're paying way more attention to Cam's game. Need to feel justified in ur heart that the Panther's did the wrong thing by getting rid of Matt Moore. We all know how that psychology works. But didn't Matt not lose his starting job to Jimmy? Do u hate Jimmy also?

Also, sad to see that Matt Moore couldn't win the starting job from a QB who had to hear chants of Kyle Orton from the team fans during his TC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...