Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star Wars: The Old Republic

Montsta

By Montsta,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
Posted

Is anybody else getting this game? I've never been a big MMO fan as I'm not big into the whole D&D type setting, but I love Star Wars and this one is really intriguing to me. I got my pre-order code from Gamestop and entered it on the swtor site, but I don't even know if my laptop meets the system requirements for this game and I couldn't find them posted anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
Posted

I beta tested this game like 4 or 5 months ago. It looked like World of Warcraft with upgraded graphics. Don't get me wrong, you still need a beast PC to play this game becasue there is so much junk to load, but other than that its pretty much just World of Warcraft except every quest actually connects to the story. If you've ever played Mass Effect or Knights of the Old Republic tho, imagine all those dialouge choices being in the game too. Bioware did a very good job and I recommend anyone with time to play it, I can't devote time to an MMO so I probably won't be getting it tho. It will be the next biggest MMO if for no other reason that Star Wars + WoW = who wouldn't buy it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

warhammer online had great pvp in many ways.

my problem is more it sounds like it'll be just another game with just more battlegrounds and no real motivation to have meaningful world pvp or organized pvp.

guild wars 2 looks great for pvp though it's still early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...