Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Simple way to stop Jaguars run game and MJD.


PantherFanForLife

Recommended Posts

Which is why they lost 32-3. Something tells me that wasn't their plan though. That had more to do with that 1.8 QB passing rating which is why they are starting Gabbert.

If they want to keep running the ball when they're down two scores.......be my guest.

the problem is the jets have a much better defense than carolina...and they still couldn't keep mjd from producing 100 yards of offense.

they aren't going to put the game on the back of a rookie.

it'll be the defense and the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why they lost 32-3. Something tells me that wasn't their plan though. That had more to do with that 1.8 QB passing rating which is why they are starting Gabbert.

If they want to keep running the ball when they're down two scores.......be my guest.

Eh...that may not be the best plan against this D...If we can make Beanie Wells look like Marshall Faulk we'll probably make MJD look like Berry Sanders. I'd rather stack the box and force Gabbert to throw the football at any point in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know you're cool with Jax scoring on every drive except the first one.

You don't connect the dots, do you? Let me re-state it cause maybe you missed it. When a football team is ahead, especially by two scores or more, the run game becomes an ineffective tool for the other team to use.

You see, when a football team is down and losing...their goal is to first tie the game, and then score....BEFORE the clock reaches 0.00 in order to win the football game. This is typically achieved by passing because the run game is not only slower, but the clock doesn't stop.

So let me re-state it for you a little more clearly because I guess maybe my initial OP was too complicated: It forces their rookie QB to THROW THE BALL. Which does give our D a chance to stop them. Meaning NO: they won't score on every down. Our D has a much better chance against their passing attack, then their running attack, as things stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't connect the dots, do you? Let me re-state it cause maybe you missed it. When a football team is ahead, especially by two scores or more, the run game becomes an ineffective tool for the other team to use.

You see, when a football team is down and losing...their goal is to first tie the game, and then score....BEFORE the clock reaches 0.00 in order to win the football game. This is typically achieved by passing because the run game is not only slower, but the clock doesn't stop.

So let me re-state it for you a little more clearly because I guess maybe my initial OP was too complicated: It forces their rookie QB to THROW THE BALL. Which does give our D a chance to stop them. Meaning NO: they won't score on every down. Our D has a much better chance against their passing attack, then their running attack, as things stand.

I think we all get it. The problem is you said this is a "plan". OK-the next time Ron has his coaches meeting he states the plan is to get ahead by 14 points real quick. When they stop laughing....

I hear in my head Bear Bryant saying...That ain't a plan son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, our goal should be to make MJD string his runs to the sidelines. Up the middle, with our DTs, is our weak spot. Even with losing TD and Beason, we have fast LBs that can get to him if we force him to run to the edge. Just cock the linemen (like, have our 3-tech playing a 4 and having him crash hard on the guards outside shoulder, forcing him into A-gap while controlling B-gap) and tell them to crash hard, don't give up the inside gaps. Just have to make sure our outside backers are cheating a little more outside-shoulder of the tackles so they can get there to force the play back inside. And since we will most likely have 8 in the box, that shouldn't be too much to ask.

Of course, need a fast start from the offense again and we have to play with the lead the whole game just to force Jacksonville's hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Score first and stay ahead

If we stay ahead .. why do we need to even worry about their running game?

that's really just stating the obvious .. no offense

If we stay ahead they can run/pass for 5000 yards and we'll still win!

What we need are ling sustained drives ... aka run the ball better

Just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple plan but not so easy to execute. That's like saying to get to the moon you need to get in a rocket and go very fast.

technically its as simple as getting up to 25,000 mph (Earth's escape velocity) regardless of the craft you're in. If you could eject yourself from a trampoline at that speed while being pointed at the moon, assuming you would make it through the atmosphere, you would get to the moon.

Very easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

technically its as simple as getting up to 25,000 mph regardless of the craft you're in. If you could eject yourself from a trampoline at that speed while being pointed at the moon, assuming you would make it through the atmosphere, you would get to the moon.

Very easy.

Wouldn't you have to lead the target just a bit?

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we stay ahead .. why do we need to even worry about their running game?

that's really just stating the obvious .. no offense

If we stay ahead they can run/pass for 5000 yards and we'll still win!

What we need are ling sustained drives ... aka run the ball better

Just my opinion

Early. Yeah it's stating the obvious, but I see more people concerned bout our D's inability to stopping their run when it may end up being a moot point instead of being concerned with the bigger problem:

If we let them go up......then they can keep our offense off the field and chew up the clock and at that point Cam isn't a shoe-in for a 400 yard game like everyone, including analysts, are predicting. It becomes a very hard game for us at that point.

Also getting ahead early against the Jags isn't the same as getting ahead early against GB. That's kind of the point that may have not been so obvious. Getting up early may just end up being the key to actually winning this game as early as the first quarter. That's not the case against other heavy hitting offenses. And it wasn't against Green Bay. I'd feel quite comfortable being 13-0 against the Jags after the first quarter. I was pissed and as nervous as if we were 0-0 when we were up 13-0 on Green Bay.

The Jaguars, even with their great running game can't produce the kind of offense our team can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I said "way", but reading is optional anyway it seems.

I can read just fine ty.

Def of way in that context-a course or plan of action.

Man I do not disagree with your premise-I would love to see us go up early because what you said would probably be true. But then again who would not want to go up by 14 early against anyone regardless of what their strengths are? That logic could apply to any game. Would a way to beat the Patriots be go down by 14 so they now run the ball?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can read just fine ty.

Def of way in that context-a course or plan of action.

Man I do not disagree with your premise-I would love to see us go up early because what you said would probably be true. But then again who would not want to go up by 14 early against anyone regardless of what their strengths are? That logic could apply to any game. Would a way to beat the Patriots be go down by 14 so they now run the ball?

Green Bay? They gave the ball to us. They had the confidence of coming back from behind even if we scored, and getting the ball first in the second quarter. Paid off for them I would say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...