Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Future Hall of Famer Vince Young was active but didn't play yesterday?

dimbee

By dimbee,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted

Young had missed a lot of time and I don't think he is 100% from his hamstring injury. Anyway, Kafka played well in relief last week and Young doesn't have the offense down yet from what I hear because he has been out of practice for several weeks.

Who knows who would start this week but from what I hear, Vick's hand is not broke and the initial x-ray was wrong. Not sure how true that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dimbee Newbie

dimbee

Posted
  • Author
Posted

"Future hall of famer". That quote was what two seasonns ago? Do you start threads saying Jay "bigger arm than Elway" Cutler?? I mean dude aint even playing and he gets a bash thread for being hurt.

Dude, where did I even bash him? If he was hurt then he shouldn't have been an the active roster, which goes back to the premise of the thread. If he was active, why wasn't he playing when Vick went down? My goodness, people are climbing over themselves to make this thread something that it is not. I think JR cleared it up, honestly. VY hasn't been able to fully digest the playbook because of his injury and isn't ready to play.

Had I used "Dreamteamer" would that have been more acceptable to you, KT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...