Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Refs handed the Giants the game against the Cards


Matthias

Recommended Posts

They said Cruz gave himself up, so the play was over. Yet I remember this very exciting play back in the 03-04 playoffs........

According to the bogus rule the NFL made up to save face, that play by Marvin Harrison should have never happened.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, after seeing it, that the Giant's players intent was to give himself up... he did stumble, but then laid down. Now, is that a rule, that a player can "give himself up", I have no idea.

If he hadn't intended to "give himself up" I don't think he would have laid the ball down.

Listen to Pereira and he's right... once the refs ruled the play dead, it doesn't really matter what happened... the ref made the error by ending the play, not on the review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen some guys this year get up after not being touched. Even if it is a rule, it should be enforced both ways. I bet not see a highlight of a guy running in for a touchdown because he was not touched down, because if that happens, the NFL will have to be fined.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I'm glad we didn't take Patrick Peterson with our first pick. He was supposed to be one of the guys that could come in right away and have an immediate impact, yet Hakeem got him to fall for the okey-doke.

yea its looking more and more that his future maybe at safely but he is still a rookie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen some guys this year get up after not being touched. Even if it is a rule, it should be enforced both ways. I bet not see a highlight of a guy running in for a touchdown because he was not touched down, because if that happens, the NFL will have to be fined.:D

feel free to collect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...