Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Redskins Defense Pts allowed and Cam's Pass efficiency

FugginPoo

By FugginPoo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

FugginPoo Experienced

FugginPoo

Posted
Posted

NYG 14

AZ 21

Dallas 18

St. Louis 10

Philly 20

Panthers 33

Above are the teams and the points the Redskins Defense allowed before yesterday, which gives you an idea of how dangerous the Panthers Offense can be. I really think this Offense should put up 24+ points per game no matter who we play, we just need a Defense to hold teams to less than that on the other-side of the ball.

Below are Cam's game-game Pass Attempt/Completion Stats this season, he had far fewer pass attempts vs. Redskins but was much more Efficient than the previous games.

Going into yesterday vs. Redskins, Cam was Avg. over 38 Pass Attempts a game with over 22 completions. Against the Redskins, only 23 attempts. Look what an established Run Game does for his overall stats.

Comp. Attempts Comp% Yards

AZ 24 37 64.9 422

Packers 28 46 60.9 432

Jags 18 34 52.9 158

Bears 27 46 58.7 374

Saints 16 31 51.6 224

ATL 21 35 60 237

Redskins 18 23 78.3 256

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

Yup, our offense is in it's infancy and we're already one of the most explosive offenses in the league.

Really encouraged by LaFell's development, when Gettis returns and we have two burners along with LaFell taking over for Naanee in the slot, we're going to be unstoppable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

makes me giddy thinking about the future. it seems the redskins's D is bend but don't break. the only other two teams to score over 20, AZ and PHILLY, on the skins came from big plays. i like the fact that we really only had one big play, which i might add was NOT a busted coverage, just a well-thrown and well-caught ball. looking forward to improving this one game at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Clowney released

      By Waldo · Posted

      Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • pantherclaw
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      I have zero issues with this.  
    • MHS831
      Panthers start making cuts to roster

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Sorta related.  I just looked up a stat:  Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders.  I was surprised that it is 49%.  The success rate for first rounders is 58%.   Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers.  Busts do that too.  However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value.  Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters.  I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%.    While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh?  Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt.  Not the point.  The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact.  If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters.  If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters.  Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders. 
×
×
  • Create New...