Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lee Ziemba?

jtnc

By jtnc,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jai. Collaborator

Jai.

Posted
Posted

Yea, the penalties suck, but in his defense, ALOT of the holding calls this year, not just against us, but throughout the league as a whole, there has been absolutely no consistency with the holding calls. The refs should lose a few game checks this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat'sGrowl Newbie

Cat'sGrowl

Posted
Posted

Here we go again. Ziemba has played. He was horrid. He doesn't have the speed to match the DE's on the edge, which was big concern coming out for him. Regardless of peoples assumptions, Bell has played well enough. I would like for anyone who thinks he was the weakest link on the OL Sunday to please speak up, so I know to just ignore that person in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtnc Newbie

jtnc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Here we go again. Ziemba has played. He was horrid. He doesn't have the speed to match the DE's on the edge, which was big concern coming out for him. Regardless of peoples assumptions, Bell has played well enough. I would like for anyone who thinks he was the weakest link on the OL Sunday to please speak up, so I know to just ignore that person in the future.

Pretty sure he wasn't the weakest link Sunday, but he has been nothing but below average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat'sGrowl Newbie

Cat'sGrowl

Posted
Posted

please ignore me

If you feel that he was then you are either

A) Retarded

B) Not paying attention and assuming what you "know"

C) Pining for Matt Kalil, a player 99% of the people here would have no interest in if his last name was Johnson.

D) Retarded.

Titans brought pressure through the middle all day on first. Hangartner got manhandled whether they brought it or not anytime else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...