Deangelo Williams 2011 vs 2008

[Argus Plexus]

I hate to see someone like Williams and Stewart having so few carries but if it is only a one year deal to develop Cam then I am all for it. Williams stats aren't that bad considering the carries. The only stat that is really down is touchdowns which is due to the fact we are using Cam on the goal line to punch it in which has been very succesful.

Next year we need to change the Game plan and run the ball more which will set up for play action and big plays down field. I remember watching us run almost every play against a drive in the Detroit game and it made me think how great our team could be if we ran a lot more. More running means less turnovers and bad throws from Cam, more rest for the D and the longer our D is off the field the better, not to mention we now have a 3 headed monster because we have basically 3 rbs.

Yes. Next season, expect more running, and more goal-line punches from Double Trouble, less of Cam taking hits and taking goal-line runs on purpose. But also expect more deep throws to Smitty, Gettis, LaFell, Olsen, Shockey, Barnidge (Hopefully), and Naanee if he's still here (Somehow I doubt it). We need a right tackle.

Need a better ST's coach. Coverage and blocking in all phases sucks SO BAD. I LOVE Pilares's return skills. IMO we should let Edwards go, he can't break tackles, he dances too much out there, and he's not as fast as he was made out to be. I love his drive, he's come a long ass way, but I just don't believe he can provide next season what Pilares can RIGHT NOW. He's not bad, he just doesn't fit here right now. NEED to fix our kickers. Mare chokes, Baker's leg isn't what it used to be, though he uncorks a good one every so often. Not saying cut Baker, but we should start Punter hunting.

Defense needs an overhaul. Johnson, Hardy, Kaiser (What a find!), R. Edwards, Anderson, Beason, Davis, Gaither, T. Williams, Godfrey, Gamble would be the only must-keeps for me on D#.

[Marguide]

Defense needs an overhaul. Johnson, Hardy, Kaiser (What a find!), R. Edwards, Anderson, Beason, Davis, Gaither, T. Williams, Godfrey, Gamble would be the only must-keeps for me on D#.

Gaither, along with all LB's that carry the surname "Williams" should be gone yesterday. Senn is out-playing all of them.

[Argus Plexus]

Gaither, along with all LB's that carry the surname "Williams" should be gone yesterday. Senn is out-playing all of them.

Thomas Williams was making heads roll when he was in there

[Marguide]

Thomas Williams was making heads roll when he was in there

Yeah and it often cost us 15 yards in field position. He is too undisciplined.

[Argus Plexus]

Yeah and it often cost us 15 yards in field position. He is too undisciplined.

I don't recall any bad hits being called on him.

[Marguide]

I don't recall any bad hits being called on him.

Review the Washington game. But it is not just the penalties as we have others that are worse. He was often out of position in his short time on the field.

To his credit, he also made some nice plays, especially in pass defense, but I don't see him as someone we are going to have a lot of interest in going forward.

[Floppin]

CJ's offer from ATL did in Fact dwarf in the Amy offered compared to what we gave him. How you could take anything I said out of context is utterly ridiculous...

Don't hate me because I play this silly game better. He wanted to make me look dumb when it was pretty clear cut and dry. Next time, maybe he'll think before He comes at me.

Listen dippoo, I wasn't "coming at you", but since you feel like insulting me, fug you too. I was trying to get you to clarify your statement, which for the second time doesn't make any sense.

So tell me, who do you think offered CJ more money, Carolina or Atlanta? If you say Carolina, that would be correct but your original statement wouldn't make any sense, not that that is anything out of the ordinary.

[adub2b23]

Talk about derailed

[TruCatzFan]

Listen dippoo, I wasn't "coming at you", but since you feel like insulting me, fug you too. I was trying to get you to clarify your statement, which for the second time doesn't make any sense.

So tell me, who do you think offered CJ more money, Carolina or Atlanta? If you say Carolina, that would be correct but your original statement wouldn't make any sense, not that that is anything out of the ordinary.

Holy fugpoo...a synonym for Dwarf is small... Which means that ATL offered him way less than what we offered him. Is that clear enough for you? How many different ways must I break it down for u?

[Panthro]

chill out

[Floppin]

Okay then, let me replace the word in your sentence for you.

CJ's offer from ATL did in Fact small in the Amy offered compared to what we gave him.

Yep, makes more sense now......err nope. The way you worded your sentence, TWICE, made it very hard to understand what you were trying to say. I don't know how that is so hard for you to understand. All I wanted was a clarification. Learn how to make coherent sentences if you are going to get all upset about being questioned about your intended meaning.

If you were so intent on using the word dwarf, this would have made it perfectly clear.

The amount that Carolina offered dwarfed the offer from Atlanta.

or

The amount that Atlanta offered was dwarfed by the one from Carolina.

What you said, made no fuging sense.