Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2012 mock offseason and draft.


DaCityKats

Recommended Posts

Bump anybody interested in getting a team?

* Arizona Cardinals- Gin and Juice

* Atlanta Falcons- jb online

* Baltimore Ravens- (╯°□°)╯︵

* Buffalo Bills- RadioKiller

* Carolina Panthers- CaliPanthers

* Chicago Bears- DoubleTrouble34

* Cincinnati Bengals- JawnyBlaze

* Cleveland Browns- jramsey4

* Dallas Cowboys- WolfpackPantherMan

* Denver Broncos- Miaoww

* Detroit Lions- pantherman95

* Green Bay Packers- Jackofalltrades

* Houston Texans- adub2b23

* Indianapolis Colts- carpanfan96

* Jacksonville Jaguars- llalliweid

* Kansas City Chiefs- X-Clown

* Miami Dolphins- MusikmanLP7

* Minnesota Vikings- RedMage138

* New England Patriots- DaCityKats

* New Orleans Saints- kman72

* New York Giants- Kevin Greene

* New York Jets-C42[)14C C47

* Oakland Raiders- CaliPanthers

* Philadelphia Eagles- Ken

* Pittsburgh Steelers- Bj-Monster23

* San Diego Chargers- jamos14

* San Francisco 49ers- ZackAttack23

* Seattle Seahawks- BigBeast52

* St. Louis Rams- ROCKnROLLA

* Tampa Bay Buccaneers- X-Clown

* Tennessee Titans- CamToSmithTD

* Washington Redskins- CatMan72

UPDATED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously I would be interested in the Panthers first and foremost (like all of us), but I'm definitely in for representing a team for this. Are we doing trades involving players or no? If so, we probably need to appoint a committee to veto trades so there are no ridiculous deals sending someone like Phillip Rivers or Aaron Rogers packing....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously I would be interested in the Panthers first and foremost (like all of us)' date=' but I'm definitely in for representing a team for this. Are we doing trades involving players or no? If so, we probably need to appoint a committee to veto trades so there are no ridiculous deals sending someone like Phillip Rivers or Aaron Rogers packing....[/quote']

Yes to player trades and we should have a group to veto BS trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll take the rams but i don't feel like running the thing again.

as far as the FA bidding that added a whole extra 1-2 weeks worth to the thing. i think it'd be better to either use the actual NFL free agent moves or b) use some blind bidding system where you can just submit all the FAs you want and what $$$ you bid for them and then use the rules/system to figure out who gets who. that way you don't have to bid, get outbid, rebid, checking back over and over for days, ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can't really get everyone online all at once. that's why last year we had to let people bid then give the top bid a few days to sit there, let people get online to outbid if they want, before pushing it through. that just makes it take forever though, which is why i said blind bidding system if anything.

i wouldn't mind just going by the actual NFL FA moves this year though, as it'll actually be before the draft like normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you could actually set a time/date and get all 32 teams owners into a chat at once that would work as well. name a player, people bid bid bid, going once, twice...gone! move on to the next player... might take an hour or two but it'd be done with rather than stringing out the bidding for weeks. only thing is i'm not so sure you can get the majority of 32 people to show up all at once

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...