Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for veterans...


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

I had an interesting discussion with my father (20 years US Army) last night, and I wanted to get the opinion of some other veterans on this issue.

Some background...

On Monday, a buddy that my brother served with in Iraq was shot and killed by NC State Troopers. Without going into too many details, he fled the scene of a wreck and was shot after firing on the officers.

He had recently returned from his second tour, and had come home, as many veterans do, to a life very different than the one he left behind. (business/family issues) He obviously was having trouble dealing with these problems and this very likely led to his confrontation with the officers.

So, my question is, do you believe that the military should institute some sort of mandatory exit counseling program for servicemen returning from overseas?

Not just for PTSD or other combat related issues, but also to help deal with the effects of having to put your life on hold for 1-2 years at a time.

The issues that our veterans face returning from overseas go far beyond what they experienced while they were there, but often what has changed once they get back.

The stories are far too common of servicemen coming home to find that their wife/girlfriend has left. Friends/family have moved away or are simply no longer there for them. Many Guardsmen/Reservists, in particular, have small businesses that cannot be sustained with them being deployed for a year or more.

I know that the military offers extensive counseling for those that ask for it. But as we all know, we as humans are often too proud to ask for help with matters of depression/mental illness. So, should the military require returning servicemen to go through a comprehensive exit counseling program before returning home?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an interesting discussion with my father (20 years US Army) last night, and I wanted to get the opinion of some other veterans on this issue.

Some background...

On Monday, a buddy that my brother served with in Iraq was shot and killed by NC State Troopers. Without going into too many details, he fled the scene of a wreck and was shot after firing on the officers.

He had recently returned from his second tour, and had come home, as many veterans do, to a life very different than the one he left behind. (business/family issues) He obviously was having trouble dealing with these problems and this very likely led to his confrontation with the officers.

So, my question is, do you believe that the military should institute some sort of mandatory exit counseling program for servicemen returning from overseas?

Not just for PTSD or other combat related issues, but also to help deal with the effects of having to put your life on hold for 1-2 years at a time.

The issues that our veterans face returning from overseas go far beyond what they experienced while they were there, but often what has changed once they get back.

The stories are far too common of servicemen coming home to find that their wife/girlfriend has left. Friends/family have moved away or are simply no longer there for them. Many Guardsmen/Reservists, in particular, have small businesses that cannot be sustained with them being deployed for a year or more.

I know that the military offers extensive counseling for those that ask for it. But as we all know, we as humans are often too proud to ask for help with matters of depression/mental illness. So, should the military require returning servicemen to go through a comprehensive exit counseling program before returning home?

The military, at least active duty, does have mandatory counseling for separating soldiers. However, this is mainly geared towards people who have no experience in the civilian workforce and usually sets unrealistic expectations.

The guy you are talking about was a National Guardsman. They're basically given some paperwork that says "I was there" and sent on their ways. I read about this guys story about being divorced and losing his business while injuries may have prevented him from performing manual labor. To me, this seems like a clear case of suicide by cop. I think the guy was overwhelmed by issues and I doubt any counseling he received would have helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...