Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yet another hypothetical scenario...


Zcustom

Recommended Posts

Good questions by all.

I'm very good at all aspects of my job, and I keep the customers happy and grow the business.

2 years ago (some of you may remember) I was assaulted by an employee and my boss was a total douche about it. Ever since then I lost my "want to" to do things quickly for him. That's his only complaint about me. I still do his menial tasks, just when I have time instead of dropping whatever I was doing for his stuff.

He's not hiring his replacement, the guy who is wants me in the job. I was told by this guy that my boss said these things while he was telling the board I was the guy for the job.

I'm very good at what I do but my boss is a douche, and I have zero desire to impress him anymore. Also, I'm a warehouse manager, and I run 95-98% inventory accuracy, conduct the most thorough and accurate inventory in the company every year, and have 98-99% accuracy of deliveries. All these numbers are the highest in the company by a wide margin. He makes no mention of these things ever, only that my safety meeting was a day late etc.

I want to go kick him in the balls and tell him to kiss my ass, but of course I can't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell corporate that youre the reason for the turnaround and to give you 6 months at the position. At that time they can re-evaluate, cross that bridge when you come to it... If they dont like you at that point, hopefully you made the most of that 6 months and have another gig lined up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hope it all works out for ya Z. Not saying this is you, and I know it wasn't me...but not all #2's are qualified or necesarilly the best person to take the #1 job when it's open. Some people reach their peak at 2!

What it really boils down to is my boss knows I'll do a better job than him. He doesn't want to be shown up, especially since he'll be working side by side with the people I'm going to impress.

Like I said the person in charge of filling that position told me I'm his guy, so that's good enough for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have all the facts but I will ask the question are their requirements for the other job that require additional experience in area's other than logistics? By way of example is their perhaps an operational or financial component, or a risk management aspect that you weren't exposed to as a number 2?

To me it sounds like dude could have purposely stunted your professional growth because he felt you were a threat to his role but you were useful because you had a strength which he didn't...which IMO would deserve a good kick in the balls.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have all the facts but I will ask the question are their requirements for the other job that require additional experience in area's other than logistics? By way of example is their perhaps an operational or financial component, or a risk management aspect that you weren't exposed to as a number 2?

To me it sounds like dude could have purposely stunted your professional growth because he felt you were a threat to his role but you were useful because you had a strength which he didn't...which IMO would deserve a good kick in the balls.....

winner winner chicken dinner

The guy hiring his replacement has validated all the things I've had issues with my boss over. He sees the same crap I've seen for 10 years.

My boss doesn't care if you show up on time, hell he doesn't care about anything unless it makes him look bad. He makes excuses for poor performers, says "nothing is a problem unless I've heard about it 5 times", and just doesn't care. I'm so glad he's leaving

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have all the facts but I will ask the question are their requirements for the other job that require additional experience in area's other than logistics? By way of example is their perhaps an operational or financial component, or a risk management aspect that you weren't exposed to as a number 2?

To me it sounds like dude could have purposely stunted your professional growth because he felt you were a threat to his role but you were useful because you had a strength which he didn't...which IMO would deserve a good kick in the balls.....

Also, to address you first paragraph, I've all but begged my boss to show me some of these things over the years and he refuses.

I'm more than capable of doing them though, and the folks in corporate know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...