Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sherlock


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

From the BBC, replayed on PBS. A depiction of Sherlock Holmes and his supporting players in a modern day setting.

I saw the ad, got the gist of it, and thought this would suck worse than a black hole.

Then I watched...

It was some of the best television I've seen in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good stuff. We caught one of these while channel surfing one night and got hooked. We get BBC here in Holland.

My only complaint in the more recent versions of Holmes (both in the Downey/Law movies and this television version) is the depiction of him as a completely inconsiderate a$$hole at times, or at least someone who is completely out of touch with social protocol. Kinda like Sheldon Cooper meets Rain Man.

Holmes wasn't like this in the Doyle stories I've read. Eccentric and somewhat oblivious at times, yes. A cocaine user (if not addict), yes. But pretty much always a gentleman and as a rule, rather patient. He was only mildly condescending towards Watson. He did have some disdain for Lestrade and Scotland Yard as a whole, but more because he felt they should be better at their jobs.

That said, I think the more recent depiction may be more accurate. Of the people I've known with exceptionally high intelligence, most of them do exhibit real problems in social situations and aren't always aware that they may be doing or saying things that others find inappropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good stuff. We caught one of these while channel surfing one night and got hooked. We get BBC here in Holland.

My only complaint in the more recent versions of Holmes (both in the Downey/Law movies and this television version) is the depiction of him as a completely inconsiderate a$$hole at times, or at least someone who is completely out of touch with social protocol. Kinda like Sheldon Cooper meets Rain Man.

Holmes wasn't like this in the Doyle stories I've read. Eccentric and somewhat oblivious at times, yes. A cocaine user (if not addict), yes. But pretty much always a gentleman and as a rule, rather patient. He was only mildly condescending towards Watson. He did have some disdain for Lestrade and Scotland Yard as a whole, but more because he felt they should be better at their jobs.

That said, I think the more recent depiction may be more accurate. Of the people I've known with exceptionally high intelligence, most of them do exhibit real problems in social situations and aren't always aware that they may be doing or saying things that others find inappropriate.

He was a knob in the Sir Arthur Conan Doyle stories too. It's been speculated that he has aspergers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I definitely think you could get the sense that Sherlock was a bit of a tool from the books.

The characters of Gil Grissom, Gregory House, Doctor Who and even Hannibal Lecter all have some roots in Holmes, and all could be somewhat jerkish (obviously Lecter a bit more so than the others).

Heck, this version of Holmes even describes himself as a high-functioning sociopath, almost like a Hannibal Lecter that just chooses not to kill and eat people.

What I liked most about the first episode I saw is that they left a lot to your own judgment. Is he really a good guy at heart or just kind of an amoral narcissist? Are some of his deductions actually just good guesses? How far would he really go to solve a case? And is solving the case really about helping others or his own ego?

I'd add that the whole Mycroft/Moriarty setup (won't spoil it) was brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...