Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Whitney Mercilus


CardiacCats

Recommended Posts

Just for poo and giggles, let's take a look at JPP's scouting profile out of USF:

http://walterfootball.com/scoutingreport2010jpierrepaul.php

6'6", 265

Strengths:

Prototypical size with room to bulk

Ridiculously quick first step

Has great speed and athleticism

Terrific flexibility and balance

Underrated power

Plays at a very high level when motivated

Nice agility and lateral movement

Equips a variety of pass rush moves

Strong hands

Anticipates snap count well

Great counter moves

Seems comfortable in coverage

Can stand up and rush

Adept at batting down passes

Vines for arms

Very, very high upside

Scheme versatile (4-3 DE or 3-4 OLB)

Weaknesses:

Seems disinterested against the run

A little too finesse - needs to be more aggressive

Doesn't willingly engage double teams

Hands are a work in progress

Slow to disengage

Could play with a lower pad level

Very raw and inexperienced

Could get a little stronger

Occasionally disappears in games

WHITNEY MERCILUS

6'4" 265.... exact same weight as JPP out of college, all JPPP had to do was throw on an extra 10 lbs

Strengths:

Raw speed to turn the edge

Agility to sink his hips/shoulder

Strength

Repertoire of moves

Active hands

Has the strength to anchor and hold his ground vs. the run

Always looking to force fumbles

Quick get off

Shedding blocks when pass rushing

Ability to bull rush heavy tackles and guards

Extremely athletic

Weaknesses:

One-year wonder

Lacks complete body of work in college

Quality of tackles he faced

these profiles were from walter football, a tremendous site...don't look at that and saw lol walter football

Mercilus senior stats: 57 tackles, 16 sacks, 9 FF

JPP senior stats: 45 tackles, 6.5 sacks, 2 FF

JPP had many more QUESTIONS coming out of USF, look at all the weaknesses Walter tabbed him with and look how few he has on Mercilus. The only difference is JPP is two inches taller than Mercilus, but he is still 6'4"...CJ is only 6'2".....6'4" is great size for a DE, he can get his paws up and knock passes down. Just saying JPP had questions of being a little too underweight in college and look how he turned out, not to mention, Mercilus was way better against better competition. This is stuff that can't be denied. They seem to be the SAME guy almost. I mean so far, Walter has only found 3 weaknesses against Mercilus...one was "quality of tackles he faced" when he played in the BIG 10!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd be in the mix with our SECOND pick of the draft, whether that's still in the first after a trade down with Cincinnati or NE or in the 2nd round, but definitely not with our #8/9. Just because he's a similar mold to JPP doesn't mean he's going to produce like JPP. JPP was a big risk when the Giants took him that high, he just happened to pan out. Mercilus is just as big of a risk and we're not in position to take that big of a risk with our first pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd be in the mix with our SECOND pick of the draft, whether that's still in the first after a trade down with Cincinnati or NE or in the 2nd round, but definitely not with our #8/9. Just because he's a similar mold to JPP doesn't mean he's going to produce like JPP. JPP was a big risk when the Giants took him that high, he just happened to pan out. Mercilus is just as big of a risk and we're not in position to take that big of a risk with our first pick.
He's already projected to go 12-20, a good combine/pro day and top-10 would not be a big risk for him at all. I think he's the best pass rusher in the draft. Much more consistent than Couples.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm ready to see how they respond to my last post, probably something with like "Walter Football is terrible"

walterfootball is as good a source as most, in my opinion.

He's already projected to go 12-20, a good combine/pro day and top-10 would not be a big risk for him at all. I think he's the best pass rusher in the draft. Much more consistent than Couples.

Most projections I've seen is in the bottom of the 1st or early 2nd. The risks are his size (not TOO small, but a little undersized) and only 1 year of production. Those are very real risks. Not everyone can "just add 10 lbs" and still move as fast. Like I said, I'd be ok with getting him, he could be good. But not with our 1st pick, I'd much rather have Brockers or someone who's less of a risk in my opinion.

For comparison, NFP (Wes Bunting is a pretty well respected draft analyst, more so than Walter) doesn't even have him in the top 30. They have him as the 6th rated DE. http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/scouting_department.html ESPN Insider doesn't have him in the top 32, they have him as the 5th rated DE. http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure you can just compare him and JPP and say "hey, Mercilus is getting overlooked, so did JPP." Mercilus is not even the athletic freak JPP is. Mercilus needs to improve on defending the run, I wouldn't want to draft someone with our first pick ay 8/9 who seems like a situational player. Wouldn't mind selecting him later like JawyBlaze said. But I still value Ingram over him just because he is more well rounded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...