Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

questiion Fans of taking Brockers with our first

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Why??

I do not see any reason to believe he should be drafted that high. DT's that come in and have an impact their rookie year are very rare. In addition I see nothing special done by him to prove that he would be a part of that rare breed. I personally think taking a project or someone who would take time to develop with a top 10 pick would be a waste. I understand how desperately bad everyone would like to have a playmaking DT but I just don't see one who can come in make that kind of impact immediately.

edit: fugged up thread title due to posting from cell shoud have said "question for fans of taking Brockers with our first round pick"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerVagyler Newbie

TylerVagyler

Posted
Posted

Why??

I do not see any reason to believe he should be drafted that high. DT's that come in and have an impact their rookie year are very rare. In addition I see nothing special done by him to prove that he would be a part of that rare breed. I personally think taking a project or someone who would take time to develop with a top 10 pick would be a waste. I understand how desperately bad everyone would like to have a playmaking DT but I just don't see one who can come in make that kind of impact immediately.

edit: fugged up thread title due to posting from cell shoud have said "question for fans of taking Brockers with our first round pick"

Not many CBs make a huge impact their rookie year either. And it's not just about his rookie year. He would be a nice long term answer and a safer pick than Kirkpatrick, imo.

EDIT: And please don't use PP as a CB who made an impact for his team. He made an impact as a PR, not a CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iskassim06 Newbie

iskassim06

Posted
Posted

Not many CBs make a huge impact their rookie year either. And it's not just about his rookie year. He would be a nice long term answer and a safer pick than Kirkpatrick, imo.

EDIT: And please don't use PP as a CB who made an impact for his team. He made an impact as a PR, not a CB.

Kirkpatrick is just tall..He can't really cover anyone. Plus he's injury-prone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Bwood15

Guest Bwood15

Posted
Posted

I think it's because we find ourselves in a weird position at the 8 or 9 spot.

We have needs on the offensive line, defensive line, and secondary, but this is also a very young team with very promising players.

If we draft a corner, either Captain, Hogan, or Butler find themselves as the odd man out. If we draft a DT either Edwards, Fua, McClain, Shirley, or Neblett find themselves as the odd man out.

And then you have Greg Hardy and Sherrod Martin who haven't exactly earned the rights to be full time starters, but they are both young and promising so do we look for a replacement?

I think Brockers is just the hottest defensive linemen right now. Coples is really the only other top 10 competition for him right now and the majority of fans really dislike Coples and want to to stay away. Brockers has the size and potential to be a very great player, and not just a rotational guy. A guy that can be extremely disruptive and cause a plethora of problems for the offensive line.

Edit: And most importantly, the defensive line makes the secondary look better, its not vice-versa. Thats a very important thing to take into consideration. So looking at it that way is it better to have a handful of guys that can get to the QB and cause turnovers? Or is it better to have a bunch of CB's that are all around the same skill level (besides Gamble) and then keep blaming them for being superstars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sloth Apprentice

Sloth

Posted
Posted

Process of elimination:

CB (assuming Claiborne is gone):

Kirkpatrick isn't worth a top 10 pick

Jenkins has the talent but is a headcase - not worth a top 10 pick.

DE:

You couldn't pay me to draft Coples top 10 and he'll probably be gone before we pick anyways because he's going to tear the combine a new asshole.

LB:

No Linebacker is worth a top 10 pick.

S:

No Safety is worth a top 10 pick.

That leaves Reiff/Martin/DeCastro/Brockers/Still/Floyd as value picks (and I'm not very confident Reiff will be there).

I'd say Reiff/Martin/Brockers/Still pre-combine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted

EDIT: And please don't use PP as a CB who made an impact for his team. He made an impact as a PR, not a CB.

Why people didn't see this last year before the draft is beyond me. He came in and did exactly what I expected him to do. He is a athlete and returner that happens to plays CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
  • Author
Posted

yeah, because that's the only thread talking about him.

smh

Not trying to get into a pissing match with you and going to give you some rep to prove it. Damn I know you like him and are obviously offended by the fact that we dont share the same opinion on him but no need to get bent out of shape over it.

Here's some reasons why I don't like him with the 8th/9th pick.

1.Gil Brandt and Mike Mayock both have him ranked the 3rd best DT in the draft.

2.NFL scouts told Brockers himself he projects as a late 1st round pick to early 2nd, not top 10.

3.Only Scouts Inc. has him as the best DT, from any reputable source I can find but they also have Luke Kuechly rated above him so who knows what their thinking.

4.I doubt he will realize his full potential as quickly as others that we can draft that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted

CB (assuming Claiborne is gone):

Jenkins has the talent but is a headcase - not worth a top 10 pick.

Not sure I'd go as far as saying he is a headcase. I've read that going to N.Bama actually matured and humbled him. But we all know that he will have to prove himself again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sloth Apprentice

Sloth

Posted
Posted

Not sure I'd go as far as saying he is a headcase. I've read that going to N.Bama actually matured and humbled him. But we all know that he will have to prove himself again.

I hope so, because without all the baggage, he's easily the second best CB in the draft and a very real possibility for us at 8/9. He is going to live and die by his combine interviews.

Because of all his previous trouble I don't think he has a chance to go until mid-late first, which is a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
  • Author
Posted

what's this obsession with finding a guy who is going to be a pro bowler from day 1? we are years away from competing for a superbowl. we have time to develop our talent.

I have no problem with taking players and developing them like we did with Charles Johnson and James Anderson. I just don't want to use a top 10 pick on a project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Panthers Fan 69
      Canes vs Panthers 7pm

      By Panthers Fan 69 · Posted

      Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • kungfoodude
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • strato
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By strato · Posted

      I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...