Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Total Meltdown Scenario... presented by WFNZ


L-TownCat

Recommended Posts

Shockey didn't play a single snap in the 2007 postseason.....

He was hurt.

And Steve Smith broke his leg in 2004 and missed 15 games that season. And...... What happened over 4 years ago has no relevance on this year or that he is injury prone because he missed the playoffs 4 years ago. Football is a contact sport and guys get hurt. Because it was the playoffs that story got tons of press and that is why he is considered injury prone. But that is more press than reality. He gets hurt because he is tough and doesn't run away from contact. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you implying Chud's scheme wasn't very TE friendly and didn't aid Shockey in having good numbers?

if you think last season showed Shockey is a better recieving option than Olsen I would greatly disagree w/ that.

If Chud can get his hands on a TE he likes......then Carolina won't bring back Shockey. Chud's TE isn't on this roster.

Sometimes you argue so much trying to prove a point you miss the other person's point altogether. My point is that if the system is so friendly that anyone can prosper and it inflated Shockey's numbers then why were his numbers as a function of targets and opportunities better than Olsen's. All things equal, Olsen who people say is better than Shockey, should have had much better numbers than Shockey but he didn't. Again look at the facts not your opinion from watching TV. So apparently it must either be that the system isn't as TE friendly as you suggest, Shockey must be better than you think, or Olsen must not be as good as you think. Feel free to take your pick.......... I go for number 2 but to each his own.

And as I have told you ad nauseum, if we don't bring him back it will be money not production. At 4 million we might very well not bring him back. We will have to make tough choices. Whatever we do I hope they are the right ones. Could we find a younger TE who is the next Jimmy Graham, I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes you argue so much trying to prove a point you miss the other person's point altogether. My point is that if the system is so friendly that anyone can prosper and it inflated Shockey's numbers then why were his numbers as a function of targets and opportunities better than Olsen's. All things equal, Olsen who people say is better than Shockey, should have had much better numbers than Shockey but he didn't. Again look at the facts not your opinion from watching TV.So apparently it must either be that the system isn't as TE friendly as you suggest, Shockey must be better than you think, or Olsen must not be as good as you think. Feel free to take your pick.......... I go for number 2 but to each his own.

And as I have told you ad nauseum, if we don't bring him back it will be money not production. At 4 million we might very well not bring him back. We will have to make tough choices. Whatever we do I hope they are the right ones. Could we find a younger TE who is the next Jimmy Graham, I hope so.

Both of them are very good AND this is a TE friendly system. The part that is left out completely is that Cam is a helluva QB that bought time in and around the pocket to find the open reciever waaaay down the field. Most of the time DC's tried to take away Cam's safety blanket(TE's). Next year I feel that DC's will be much more worried about the vertical threat and leave our TE's open over the middle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Steve Smith broke his leg in 2004 and missed 15 games that season. And...... What happened over 4 years ago has no relevance on this year or that he is injury prone because he missed the playoffs 4 years ago. Football is a contact sport and guys get hurt. Because it was the playoffs that story got tons of press and that is why he is considered injury prone. But that is more press than reality. He gets hurt because he is tough and doesn't run away from contact. It happens.

hey, I was just responding to someone who claimed Shockey's 2007 Superbowl ring was valuable experience he could add here.......

Shockey didn't play in that postseason run. Therefore, someone shouldn't bring up. No one was crediting Steve Smith for stuff he did in 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes you argue so much trying to prove a point you miss the other person's point altogether. My point is that if the system is so friendly that anyone can prosper and it inflated Shockey's numbers then why were his numbers as a function of targets and opportunities better than Olsen's. All things equal, Olsen who people say is better than Shockey, should have had much better numbers than Shockey but he didn't. Again look at the facts not your opinion from watching TV. So apparently it must either be that the system isn't as TE friendly as you suggest, Shockey must be better than you think, or Olsen must not be as good as you think. Feel free to take your pick.......... I go for number 2 but to each his own.

And as I have told you ad nauseum, if we don't bring him back it will be money not production. At 4 million we might very well not bring him back. We will have to make tough choices. Whatever we do I hope they are the right ones. Could we find a younger TE who is the next Jimmy Graham, I hope so.

b/c Shockey was more of a checkdown option and saw more reps than Olsen = better #'s.

I don't think Shockey is bad. Loved the signing. when Cam was about to be thrown into the fire. Needed a vet. Needed a mouth. He brought it all.

Different needs this year. We could upgrade Shockey's spot from a talent aspect.......the other stuff he brought means less now that Cam won't intentionally let the vets do the talking.

Olsen is better than Shockey only in terms of being a WR option. Shockey does the rest better. That is why I want an upgrade if we can get one.....Olsen is not Chud's definition of his TE. Neither is Shockey at this stage. So excuse me for wanting our OC to get what he really wants at one of the most important positions of his offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are you people obsessed with either of these players?

Moss can no longer separate and was basically cut from three teams his last year in the league.

Jeremy Shockey can no longer separate from anything and is a glorified 6th lineman. The Panthers could easily replace his production with a late round blocking tight end.

but noooo something something attitude goo goo ga ga

Ricky Proehl wasn't insanely productive by any means but he extended a lot of drives for us

Some players are good at getting yards but you also need the guy who makes those tough catches too

Also Shockey is apparently proud to play in our colors, which is like the fifth time in this team's history that's happened for us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ricky Proehl wasn't insanely productive by any means but he extended a lot of drives for us

Some players are good at getting yards but you also need the guy who makes those tough catches too

Also Shockey is apparently proud to play in our colors, which is like the fifth time in this team's history that's happened for us

Exactly, if an NBA team needs role players to win when loaded with superstars then a football team sure does as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying this just to argue, but many would say Shockey is the better receiver. Olsen's hands seem to disappear at times. I agree with them at the moment though Olsen has more of a future obviously.

Olsen can simply beat guys in coverage that Shockey can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b/c Shockey was more of a checkdown option and saw more reps than Olsen = better #'s.

More reps as in more plays on the field or more targets. Olsen actually was targeted with 17% of Newton's passes versus Shockey who was targeted with 12% of Newton's passes. Olsen was targeted 88 times while Shockey was targeted 62. Olsen had 6.1 yards per target while Shockey had 7.3. Olsen had a catch rate of 51%, Shockey had a catch rate of 59%.

Olsen caught 45 balls for 12 yards a catch, Shockey caught 37 balls for 12.3 yards a catch. Shockey had a better success rate, and both had a TD for every 9 catches.

Tell me again how Shockey was only a checkdown guy and saw more reps.

As for giving Chud what he wants, if there is another Jimmy Graham waiting out there who can be had on the cheap or picked up late in the draft, by all means lets get him. Until then Shockey is a good alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, guys, we can have BOTH.

^this. Sometimes you guys think way too hard...

Also to the people saying "hopefully we can find us a Jimmy Graham", are you guys saying that we should draft a tight end even though we have much greater needs on the other side of the ball and even though we already have two tight ends just so we can save ourselves a couple million? I didn't realize that our cap situation couldn't be fixed and we had to resort to creating more needs to save money. Also, you guys can call him Jimmy Graham, but I'll call him Drew Brees' tight end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't wait to go through this analysis 
    • What's more likely? An entire competant NFL front office (as many here suggest Morgan runs) has watched Bryce struggle week in and week out to perform at the bare minimum of NFL QBs for 3 years and has decided that's the future of this organization, OR our owner who has proven repeatedly he can't keep his nose out of team decision making has declared Bryce is our QB until he decides otherwise, especially given he's the one that drafted him in the first place? 
    • It is time to take a look at the defense.  Without further ado do.... Edge (OLB):  I think we overpaid for Jaelan Phillips, but he is constant pressure with 73 pressures in 2025, ranking 9th in the NFL.  In all, he was the 20th (of 111) rated pass rushing edge in 2025 according to PFF, putting him in the top 20% in the nfl.  With a pair of solid ILBs beside him and if we can get Wharton going, I think the sum of the parts will make him better than he was in Philly.  Furthermore, with second-year pro Princely Umanmielen behind him, I expect him to grow with the tutoring and competition. On the other side, the duo of Nick Scourton and Patrick Jones II is strong, in my view.  Scourton generated 34 total pressures as a pass rusher. That total included 8 sacks, 23 hurries, 3 hits. Against the run, he recorded 28 solo tackles. For a rookie, second round, edge, that is great.  He also forced 1 fumble on the season. Jones was decent in 2025 in just 131 snaps, but he is solid veteran depth.   We seem to lack the elite pass rusher, but this rotational unit will be a big upgrade over last season.  Expect Scourton and Princely to show improvement. While it is unlikely that we add more to edge this draft, you can never have too many pass rushers (well, you can--two sophomores and two veterans is a good mix). Would the Panthers take an edge if one was sitting there? Absolutely. Defensive End:  Derrick Brown is a stud.  I did not notice how dominant he became as a pass rusher.  His PFF pass-rush grade of 72.0 ranked 23rd among 134 qualified interior defensive linemans. His run-defense grade of 66.3 ranked 22nd at the position. He generated 35 total pressures as a pass rusher. That total included 6 sacks, 23 hurries, 6 hits. On the other side:  What the hell?  Tershawn Wharton earned a 40.8 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 127th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemans. His PFF pass-rush grade of 57.0 ranked 95th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemen. His run-defense grade of 34.8 ranked 125th at the position. However, Wharton needs to be situational and we really need a few DEs who can plug and pressure.  LaBryan Ray is an interior defensive lineman for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 45.7 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season.  You cannot tell me that we are not going to add a DE.  In my view, this is a HUGE need that we have not adequately addressed.  There were only 3 DEs in the NFL who played more snaps that Derrick Brown.  We have to give him more blows during the game.  So After Brown, we have 2 other players who need to improve a lot to reach mediocre. Nose Tackle:  Of course, a NT might move out some to help stuff the run at DE opposite Brown, and stats do not always reflect on a NT's actual value.  Bobby Brown III earned a 54.1 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 80th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemen.  His PFF pass-rush grade of 51.1 ranked 126th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemans. His run-defense grade of 57.8 ranked 51st at the position.   Behind him, Cam'Ron Jackson is an  earned a 45.5 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season.   The defensive line is weak, based on 2025 performance rankings in PFF.  After DBrown, they pretty much suck.  These are the guys our ILBs will be counting on. Inside Linebacker:  Devin Lloyd earned a 89.1 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 3rd among 88 qualified linebackers. His PFF coverage grade of 81.1 ranked 3rd among 88 qualified linebackers. His run-defense grade of 83.2 ranked 11th at the position. His pass-rush grade of 82.2 ranked 5th among qualified linebackers.  He's good.  At the moment, beside him is Trevin Wallace  who earned a 55.9 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 57th among 88 qualified linebackers. His PFF coverage grade of 64.5 ranked 25th among 88 qualified linebackers. His run-defense grade of 42.3 ranked 85th at the position. His pass-rush grade of 64.2 ranked 45th among qualified linebackers.  Wallace was best as a coverage LB, and based on my memory, I am not sure he was in the top third, but if PFF says so...however, he was nearly last vs. the run.  We need better to play beside Lloyd.  Bam Morris-Scott earned a 37.6 overall PFF defensive grade. To put that in perspective, I was rated by PFF at 32.3 on my couch.   Cherilus Claudin is the third best ILB on the roster right now. He earned a 59.2 overall PFF defensive grade in just over 200 snaps.  Having lost Rozeboom, the Panthers are very thin behind Lloyd.  Look for a starting-caliber ILB in the draft.  Wallace is not the guy, but he is decent depth. Nickel CB:  Chau Smith-Wade  earned a 57.0 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 79th among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His PFF coverage grade of 57.2 ranked 79th among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His run-defense grade of 55.4 ranked 77th at the position.  For a nickel, he played a lot--garnering over 600 snaps.  Corey Thornton was a pleasant surprise, until he was injured.  However, in just 127 snaps, he was very good, earning a 68.5 overall PFF defensive grade.  I think he can play outside in a pinch, but nickel might be his gig.  I am not sold that Nickel is in good hands, but Thornton is promising.  Smith-Wade is average, and with the experience he has accumulated, we are probably not prioritizing Nickel, but there are some good nickels in the draft. Cornerback:  Michael Jackson should have been in the pro bowl.  He earned a 79.1 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 4th among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His PFF coverage grade of 80.9 ranked 3rd among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His run-defense grade of 67.2 ranked 36th at the position. He recorded 4 interceptions on the season. Jackson broke up 9 passes in coverage. He allowed a 72.9 passer rating when targeted by opposing quarterbacks --SOLID!!  Our second-best CB, Jaycee Horn, was in the pro bowl.  He earned a 57.8 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 76th among 114 qualified corner.backs. His PFF coverage grade of 61.6 ranked 61st among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His run-defense grade of 50.5 ranked 87th at the position.  He recorded 5 interceptions on the season.  Our CBs had NINE interceptions in 2025.  It is doubtful they duplicate that figure, but Jackson was our best CB.   We are thin at CB, but the two we put out there are solid.  Nickel, at this time, is "meh," but both are developing and should improve.  A great draft for Nickel.  The Panthers will add a CB somehow. Safety:  For now, Trevon Moehrig is as advertised--above average vs. the run, below average in coverage, making him average. He earned a 64.3 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 50th among 98 qualified safeties. His PFF coverage grade of 55.3 ranked 64th among 98 qualified safeties. His run-defense grade of 73.5 ranked 37th at the position.  Lathan Ransom got some valuable experience in 2025, getting in on 330 plays or so.  He earned a 62.9 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 56th among 98 qualified safeties.  (Average, not bad for a day 3 rookie) His PFF coverage grade of 55.8 ranked 63rd among 98 qualified safeties. His run-defense grade of 85.1 ranked 4th at the position.  A pure strong safety, if you ask me.  Nick Scott  earned a 67.8 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 36th among 98 qualified safeties. His PFF coverage grade of 67.3 ranked 31st among 98 qualified safeties. His run-defense grade of 69.3 ranked 56th at the position.  Expect a draft pick at FS.  Demani Richardson is a safety for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 71.5 overall PFF defensive grade n 29 plays.  Nothing to see here.  Isaiah Simmons is probably more special teams than defensive player.   Overall:  We are thin on defense.  No real depth at CB, S, and DE/NT.  However, we have 5 starters who are pro bowl level players (D. Brown, Lloyd, Jackson, Horn, and Phillips--and I might throw Scourton in on that pile for the sixth potential pro bowler).  We are weak at NT, and if Wharton does not step up, DE.  Funny, I see Edge as our strength (and we really don't have a sack artist) and I love our starting CBs.  Moehrig is making too much to be average.   Expect:  In the draft, I think we have to draft a DT.  Having done this, I am not sure that we go after a S when we have such glaring needs at other positions.  We could upgrade at nickel and give the CB room more depth.  OLB?  Wallace is decent depth, and he could start in a pinch.   DE is our biggest need.  The answer could be on the roster?            
×
×
  • Create New...