Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the H do we need Weather/traffic on the news


Iceberg Slim

Recommended Posts

Whose idea was it to incorporate these things into a news cast. IMO,the weather people people rarely get it right, and as far as traffic goes, meh....if you travel the same route to work everyday, you tend to know how long it's gonna take to get to and from work.. What does the huddle think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whose idea was it to incorporate these things into a news cast. IMO,the weather people people rarely get it right, and as far as traffic goes, meh....if you travel the same route to work everyday, you tend to know how long it's gonna take to get to and from work.. What does the huddle think?

Traffic is helpful if there is a backup or wreck so you can take an alternate route. Weather is important so you know what might happen for the rest of the week, or how much snow/rain is on the way. Not everyone uses the internet for this info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Traffic is helpful if there is a backup or wreck so you can take an alternate route. Weather is important so you know what might happen for the rest of the week, or how much snow/rain is on the way. Not everyone uses the internet for this info.

I dunno, traffic is what it is, if its the way I have to go to get home, whether they report it or not, I still have to go that way. If it's a wreck, I find out about it the old fashioned way, I pass by it. Weather, yeah they might forecast what the week is going to be, but lets be honest, how often does it really turn out the way they forecast it. Me personally, I'd rather they spend that time on real news...sports...or if they have to, feel good stories...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...