Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it ok to ask an employer why you were not hired?


tarheelpride

Recommended Posts

A question I had for a long time. Recently, I began to ask employers (when they didn't give a reason or when one they gave was vague) why I was passed up for a position. I phrase it in a way saying that I want to learn from it and possibly see where else I'm weak at.

Is that a good idea? I haven't been getting responses back from any prospective employers on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good question. I have been thinking of doing the same thing. I have been unemployed for over a year now. I cant seem to get hired anywhere. I usually dont even get a response back when i apply. I have applied for hundreds of jobs over the last year and have maybe had 5 interviews. I just dont know what i am doing wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive just been through a 2 month long hiring search to fill a position. I was replacing a staff member who just wasn't working out so I had the luxury of time.

I interviewed about 30 people of the hundred plus resumes we got and in the end only a 2 or 3 of them didn't have the skills. Almost everyone I passed over was fine and probably could have handled the job but it was little things that tip the scales against them.

Some of the reasons I disqualified candidates:

A weak handshake.

Not knowing anything about who we are and what we do

Poorly fitting suit.

Smelled like an ashtray.

Couldn't name the last novel they had read.

Not a football fan.

Didn't play video games.

Those last three are big culture things among my team. Its what we talk about in our downtime.

Point being Id be wary of asking. Youll either get a lie, some canned response they tell everyone or something you really don't want to hear. Would you really want to know I disqualified you because you don't read novels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask at the conclusion of interviews what the interviewer thinks about you, and where you stand, whats the next step in the interview process, etc. I just got a job, and this was recommended to me by the recruiter. He called it closing the interview.

Also, you can't do enough homework. Research the company, come up with questions about it and its people, and always have an answer for the often asked question, "where do you see yourself in X years". It should only be about your career growth. Not personal life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive just been through a 2 month long hiring search to fill a position. I was replacing a staff member who just wasn't working out so I had the luxury of time.

I interviewed about 30 people of the hundred plus resumes we got and in the end only a 2 or 3 of them didn't have the skills. Almost everyone I passed over was fine and probably could have handled the job but it was little things that tip the scales against them.

Some of the reasons I disqualified candidates:

A weak handshake.

Not knowing anything about who we are and what we do

Poorly fitting suit.

Smelled like an ashtray.

Couldn't name the last novel they had read.

Not a football fan.

Didn't play video games.

Those last three are big culture things among my team. Its what we talk about in our downtime.

Point being Id be wary of asking. Youll either get a lie, some canned response they tell everyone or something you really don't want to hear. Would you really want to know I disqualified you because you don't read novels?

That's an incredible list. Not in a good way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive just been through a 2 month long hiring search to fill a position. I was replacing a staff member who just wasn't working out so I had the luxury of time.

I interviewed about 30 people of the hundred plus resumes we got and in the end only a 2 or 3 of them didn't have the skills. Almost everyone I passed over was fine and probably could have handled the job but it was little things that tip the scales against them.

Some of the reasons I disqualified candidates:

A weak handshake.

Not knowing anything about who we are and what we do

Poorly fitting suit.

Smelled like an ashtray.

Couldn't name the last novel they had read.

Not a football fan.

Didn't play video games.

Those last three are big culture things among my team. Its what we talk about in our downtime.

Point being Id be wary of asking. Youll either get a lie, some canned response they tell everyone or something you really don't want to hear. Would you really want to know I disqualified you because you don't read novels?

Nothing wrong with this approach imo... the person hiring (esp in a team setting) has to be comfortable with who they are hiring. Having someone around that doesn't fit in is a HUGE drag on everyone. I've interviewed probably 200+ people in my time as a manager over the last 10 years. Honestly you can kind of tell in the first few minutes if the person is right or not assuming they are actually qualified, and believe it or not that can be an issue... my old boss used to make me interview basically anyone that applied... that really sucks.

With only three people in this office, we've had that issue with new hires... sometimes someone seems right, and they just don't fit... of course, as we've all said, you can't really tell people "the reason I didn't hire is that you talk funny..." so just be prepared to get no response or something basic as we've all said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask at the conclusion of interviews what the interviewer thinks about you, and where you stand, whats the next step in the interview process, etc. I just got a job, and this was recommended to me by the recruiter. He called it closing the interview.

Also, you can't do enough homework. Research the company, come up with questions about it and its people, and always have an answer for the often asked question, "where do you see yourself in X years". It should only be about your career growth. Not personal life.

not sure I like this idea...I like the part about asking what the next steps are if successful and asking what their expected time line is etc...but I'm not going to answer you if you ask me where you stand...just my personal thought.

As for asking for follow up if not successful, I say 100% yes....do it and like you originally said, ask it in a means to improve sort of way...shows incentive, even if you're full of poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure I like this idea...I like the part about asking what the next steps are if successful and asking what their expected time line is etc...but I'm not going to answer you if you ask me where you stand...just my personal thought.

As for asking for follow up if not successful, I say 100% yes....do it and like you originally said, ask it in a means to improve sort of way...shows incentive, even if you're full of poo.

I did it on two phone interviews and two face to face interviews with the company that just hired me. I was told it lets the company know you are interested, and that good companies/interviewers have no problem giving honest answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...