Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

annoying things people put in their professional email signatures

Jase

By Jase,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Jase Apprentice

Jase

Posted
Posted

- Every possible meaningless title they have, AKA a barrage of abbreviations that most people could never decipher.

- That annoying wingding and the "please consider the environment before printing this message". I print out emails that say this 5 times each.

- "God bless our troops" or some religious message.

What are yours? :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jase Apprentice

Jase

Posted
  • Author
Posted

the persons email address, seriously???

Sometimes in an outlook email chain, that header information will get lost and only the person's name will remain. So if somebody forwards you an email and says "forward person x this file", sometimes only the person's name is there, and you'd have to ask somebody further down in the chain for the address.

I don't do it, but it could be useful for that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinwithgas Veteran

cookinwithgas

Posted
Posted

once a year before Christmas I have one guy that used to work in a department I support, but now does something else entirely, send a Christmas email thats probably not work friendly, it's almost as if he's daring someone to complain to HR so he can be all sanctimonious and whiny about it. Whenever I used to have to stop by his office it was filled with fluffy God posters and his desk had all the pseudo Chick Tract type stuff laid out in front of you.

Anyways my emails come with on call numbers, a link to my support team with a built in header...but nothing personal because thats pretty inconsiderate to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat Newbie

Cat

Posted
Posted

there's this idiot that I have the pleasure of dealing with...when he send me an email...

he asks me the question in the subject line..and then in the body he just says

Thanks,

<enter stupid pretentious name here>

lol I do that with certain people I interact with often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • countryboi
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By countryboi · Posted

      You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • Icege
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Icege · Posted

      I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Navy_football
      Clowney released

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...