Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Draft bust rates by position


MHS831

Recommended Posts

http://www.vincentvalour.com/nfl-draft-history-1st-round-positional-hitbust-rate-defense/html

Interpret this how you may, but remember, you have not researched the topic, they have. Not saying it was reliable or valid, but ususally a thread like this solicits ignorant comments from our omnipotent posters. I take it with a grain of salt, but find it to be interesting.

Defensive Tackles have a 37% hit rate in the first round of the NFL draft.

Defensive Tackles are the second worst position in the NFL draft first round. Many players end up getting dominated by superior NFL offensive lineman. Another reason DTs bust is a lot of them eat their way out of the league with poor work ethics. Teams taking a Defensive tackle in the NFL Draft watch out! (MHS831: There are a lot of question marks at DT--buyer beware)

Linebackers hit at an astonishing 69% in the first round of the NFL draft.

In this data set 3-4 OLB were classified with the linebackers. This is one of the best positions to draft in the first round of the NFL draft. The reason is there is low positional value with most linebackers, meaning only the best of the best will be drafted in the first round. Linebackers are also many times the leader of a college squad, giving them great character for the NFL. Teams taking a linebacker in the first round of the NFL draft will be pleased.

Cornerbacks hit at a fantastic rate of 69% in the first round of the NFL draft.

Oddly enough cornerbacks tend to struggle in their rookie years. Many times in the NFL draft first round, corners are taken high because of their elite athleticism and high skill. Both of which are mandatory to play the position. Teams taking a corner in the NFL draft first round should rejoice.

Defensive Ends have a 48% hit rate in the first round of the NFl draft.

In this data set defensive ends were classified as 3-4 ends, and 4-3 ends only. Outside linebackers in the 3-4 were counted as linebackers. The position of highest value on defense turned in pretty close to a 50/50 hit rate among first rounders of the NFL draft. There can be various reasons for this split. One is some defensive ends have a hard time transitioning from the 4-3 end to a 3-4 end scheme, likewise a player may be built to play as a 3-4 OLB but is forced to play the traditional 4-3 end. Also like other positions in college defensive ends may rely to much on their athleticism, and may not develop specific moves to rush the quarterback. In general many players will have what it takes to play in the NFL and some wont. Taking a Defensive End in the NFL Draft is well worth the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread I've heard the ESPN draft analyst talk about this before definately don't want a dt in the first round with this crop of lineman if there was a suh type player of course, but none of these dts are in his class as far as college production and a solid combine, and upside Brokers has one year of film to look at definately too raw and risky to take at #9 Poe had an amazing combine but not so great game film I like Fletcher Cox the most but at #9 not so much. Lb, CB, or ot with our #9 pick please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think it was written for the teams. The link is provided if you want to disprove thier research. Just threw it out there for debate.

i've seen it. they aren't the first to do this. crap...i've done it myself in the past.

too many problems with this, though. biggest one is who are the ones drafting busts? is it more of a team culture that they just suck at drafting players in general? like the lions for years kept on drafting WRs early and they kept sucking. that skews the average.

i look at research like this and just give a shrug. i think you can learn from it but only if that learning involves dealing with why those picks failed and not throwing around a "it failed because it was a DT".

there are reasons that these players busted that goes way beyond just a simple "they were just DTs" or whatever. some teams just have crappy player evals and/or don't know how to develop players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...