Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coach Rivera Says "adding Lb Depth Important"


TruCatzFan

Recommended Posts

That's very true and for some reason I knew someone were going to say that. But, dt and cb is much more important. It's going to be harder finding gems at dt/cb in this draft than lb later.

Rivera has said over and over that he DOES NOT view DT as an area of need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why bring in brockers and worthy in for visits if it wasn't important. And seeing teams ran up on our throat last year, if Dt is not a need then I don't know what is.

They are definitely covering all of their bases and doing all of their homework. But he has said many times that he does not view DT as a significant area of need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why bring in brockers and worthy in for visits if it wasn't important. And seeing teams ran up on our throat last year, if Dt is not a need then I don't know what is.

Planning for various scenarios. Draft day trades cause some players to drop into your lap. If that happens, Rivera wants to be ready. It could also signify they are at least planning for the possibility of adding picks by trading back...but since that's something I want, I'm probably just reading that into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't gaurantee that we will draft a LB. We have other positions that we have to address just as badly

I don't think that it guarantees anything.

I love the fact that Rivera and this staff are looking at all positions and what potential players may be available (trading up, staying put, or trading back) that might be available when the Panthers pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera has said over and over that he DOES NOT view DT as an area of need.

I, too, would be tempted to get Coples to pair him up with Johnson and just stick whoever the fug journeymen/noob DT in between them and see what happens. I also would like to see what getting an "elite" linebacker in Kuechly does for us and seeing if that improves Hardy/Johnson's pash rush and alleviates our DT problems. I would also be tempted to see if a solid CB is the missing piece that improves our pash rush and our weak saftey coverage.

A lot of scenarios can play out in the first round. Drafting a DT in the first round to be an impact player or getting an offensive player when we need so much help on defense would be the only scenarios I would consider as a failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't disagree more with this statement. With the rise of the TE position in "today's NFL" as you put it, the LB position has never been more important. LBers will have to check these TE's and if they can't keep up, u will get burned every time!

Linebackers are important in my opinion but if you look around the league you will see they are not valued. Look at Charles Johnson's contract, he had one good season and is making 10mil a year. Look at Jon Beason, a proven commodity and hes getting 5mil a year. Following this logic Coples/Ingram are valued higher than Kuechly. Look at the Giants last year, who was playing linebacker for them? They had a substitute teacher picking off Brady on a deep TE route. Why? Because JPP and Tuck were pressuring Brady. If you look at the money and were guys are drafted the linebacker position is not valued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you just took it to another level when you brought salaries into the equation. If you look at it like that you're absolutely right, the #'s don't lie. I think that we all could agree that having stud LBers over the middle will be something that trends in the league over the next several years after the year of the TE's. Ask the AFC East about those guys up in NE....... I bet they value the hell out of the LB position now.

The game has always been about pressuring the QB. It won't ever change either. The LBing core is about to experience a lot more in salaries than years past for what they're expected to do. They mostly always been about stuffing the run and blitzing schemes, and sometimes drop back in coverage. Now they will be dropping back in coverage far more often as the game evolves more and more into a passing league. None of this is news to any serious fan. All I'm saying is to not forget about the position and more importantly don't under value it.

Coach Rivera was a LBer himself, so I know that he's on it. We will be drafting a LB no later than the 2nd round.

As far as CB's go (earlier post in this thread) I don't see us doing that until later in the draft. Don't forget that we have Hogan and the coaching staff is Very High on his ceiling. He would have been a 1st rndr last year if not for injury and off field issues. They had to know that he likely wouldn't play last year. They have a plan and 3 defensive Gurus on our staff. It all will work out. Have faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...