Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Completely Uninformed 5 Round Mock


Crixtala

Recommended Posts

Like the mock. Not so much at first pick, eventhough Im one of Floyd's biggest bandwagoner. I think well be going D at 9th (coples/cox).

And why is it that every time a news come out that a player visited us, that you can almost guaranteed that someone is going to have a mock which will have us taking them? Lol

I'm not being a dick and attacking you. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've actually wanted Floyd for a while now... since before the combine/pro day's. i liked him better than any of the defensive prospects that looked to be available and still do now that the combine has happened and Poe and Kuechly have been thrown into the mix

now that Floyd has gotten some love from others, i figured i'd throw something together to give people an idea of what it could look like (imo, anyway) if we were to take him at 9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about explosive offense.

Not bad over all.

Our needs are well documented and you attempted to address most of them.

Would like a OL in there somewhere.

i agree. it's the only thing i really feel that's missing myself. thought about throwing something in at a later round, but see better potential in the players listed. OL is definitely the only thing I feel that could be beefed up through the draft that I didn't include.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An argument FOR taking Floyd with the #9 pick--

We upgrade 2 positions and solidify a key position (#1 WR) for 10 years. In the slot, Steve Smith's size is not an issue. He can motion and his blocking is perhaps a bigger factor. He is good over the middle and would face nickelbacks instead of #1 CBs. He would be better than Welker. Reducing the # of plays for SS would help him prolong his career (played 93% of snaps in 2011).

Now our #1 WR is 6'3" 220. We would be losing no speed (4.45) and getting a good blocking WR. He has very good hands and is a bigger target. With Smith in the slot and Lafell or Gettis in the mix, it is unlikely Floyd would face the double teams Smith faced.

It makes sense that Smith would prosper and Floyd would face single coverage. Gettis and Lafell would face #2 CBs, Throw in the receiving talents of Olson and Tolbert, Cam just got a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argument for not drafting Defense first overall:

CB: Hogan is good enough to start. He was solid during his time on the field at the end of 2011.

DT: We had 4 first-year DTs play last year and we improved down the stretch. Let young talent develop before overhauling the position. Besides, Edwards, a seasoned veteran, is joining the front 4.

DE: CJohnson came around in year 3. Hardy is entering year 3. Keiser had 4 sacks in a very few snaps--was projected to be a possible first round pick in this year's draft had he stayed in school. Applewhite showed signs of converting into a pass rusher in a 4-3 Again, let the youth develop.

LB: We have 3 starters returning, we simply need quality depth. A versatile LB would be ideal--Bobby Wagner, DeMario Davis, for example.

S: Addressed in free agency.

(not that I agree with this, but we do not know how the panthers are looking at positions)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a DT in the first or second this year is going to be a waste of a pick... look at MHS's reasoning above for why. i agree 100% on his assessment. continuing to throw youth at the position isn't going to make us any better

That's a bunch of crap. Same thing could be said at WR being a wasted pick in the 1st or 2nd round. At least Lafell look better playing his position then any DT we had last year.

I know you want a shiny new toy for Cam but don't down grade our serious need for more Playmakers on the Defensive side of the ball.

I got the best reason why we shouldn't draft Offense with the 1st 2-3 picks we make this year.

1. We didn't lose any game because of our 5th rated Offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hate to have to break this one out again so soon, but...

even with the new CBA and rookie contract structuring... i don't want to reach at the #9 spot for a DT. Cox is the closest thing to a 'sure thing' imo, and he'll even need to bulk up a bit to not be tossed aside by NFL O-lineman. everybody else is either hyped up beyong belief or someone who's going to be worked into our already young rotation. if i'm picking at #9, i want someone who's going to come in and make an immediate impact.

lets let your young guys CONTINUE to grow instead of grabbing someone who we'll immediately want in front of those guys on the depth chart... only to find out 6 games in we're in the EXACT same spot we were last season and at the same time stunted the growth of guys we brought in last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...