Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scientists Say Drinking Beer Wil Not Lead To Beer Belly


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

Scientists say drinking beer wil not lead to beer belly

700-01345024w.jpg

6 April 2012 Last updated at 10:30 ETHelp

Scientists from the German Institute of Human Nutrition say they have found proof that the beer belly is a myth.

By studying the hip and waist measurements of nearly 20,000 people over nine years and charting how much beer they drank each day, they found that beer drinking caused overall weight gain rather than causing excess fat in just the stomach area.

BBC Radio 5 live Drive spoke to Steve Miller, the host of TV show Fat Families, who has written about losing weight.

To listen to other Radio 5 live interviews, please visit the Best Bits page.

---------------------------------

Your Belly is a result of Chicken , Cow and Pork Fat building up and collecting in your fatty reserve areas (Belly, Back of Legs, Back of Arms, Buttocks)

All it is is white fat that hasnt been digested by the body because the body is not made to digest large amounts of meat.

Research what you eat my friends!

If your do not take care of your body....where will you live?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a man's caloric intake exceeds his caloric expenditure, the extra calories will be stored as fat. Since a man's fat deposits develop in the midsection first, it results in the large stomach discussed. The "beer belly" received that moniker because beer contains a lot of empty calories and a man who consumes a lot of beer without burning off those calories runs the risk of obtaining the beer belly. I thought this was common knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or, to be more specific:

3500 Calories is roughly equal to 1lb. of fat

1 beer is approx 150 Calories (a can of soda is not far behind)

Thus, 1 beer/night = 15lbs/year

But, as Bronco mentioned, as long as your burn is >= your intake you can eat/drink whatever you want. Simple math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...