Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great draft


stevesmith3428

Recommended Posts

I'm kinda disappointed we didnt look for a WR in the draft.

We have Steve but with Muhammad turning 36.. we have no real threats besides them.

Maybe the orginization thinks Jarret will develop

I was hoping for Brandon Tate, but didn't see WR as a real need. Jarrett will be a solid 3 for us this year and will adequately replace Moose when his time comes. We drafted Jarrett at 19 years of age, that alone is part of the problem in my opinion.

I wanted a true CB and a bigger DT, but we addressed all of our needs and got two steals with Brown and Robinson- both of whom I believe will be starters in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping for Brandon Tate, but didn't see WR as a real need. Jarrett will be a solid 3 for us this year and will adequately replace Moose when his time comes. We drafted Jarrett at 19 years of age, that alone is part of the problem in my opinion.

I wanted a true CB and a bigger DT, but we addressed all of our needs and got two steals with Brown and Robinson- both of whom I believe will be starters in the future.

WOW Jarrett was 19 when we got him? I knew he was young but damn. Was he only at USC for a year?

I don't think WR we'll be much of a concern. I think by not drafting one it says alot of what they think of Jarrett now. We also have Ryne Robinson and we might see the new guy Goodson at WR at times. And I agree with Joat that Robertson would be a wise signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...