Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great draft


stevesmith3428

Recommended Posts

I'm kinda disappointed we didnt look for a WR in the draft.

We have Steve but with Muhammad turning 36.. we have no real threats besides them.

Maybe the orginization thinks Jarret will develop

I was hoping for Brandon Tate, but didn't see WR as a real need. Jarrett will be a solid 3 for us this year and will adequately replace Moose when his time comes. We drafted Jarrett at 19 years of age, that alone is part of the problem in my opinion.

I wanted a true CB and a bigger DT, but we addressed all of our needs and got two steals with Brown and Robinson- both of whom I believe will be starters in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping for Brandon Tate, but didn't see WR as a real need. Jarrett will be a solid 3 for us this year and will adequately replace Moose when his time comes. We drafted Jarrett at 19 years of age, that alone is part of the problem in my opinion.

I wanted a true CB and a bigger DT, but we addressed all of our needs and got two steals with Brown and Robinson- both of whom I believe will be starters in the future.

WOW Jarrett was 19 when we got him? I knew he was young but damn. Was he only at USC for a year?

I don't think WR we'll be much of a concern. I think by not drafting one it says alot of what they think of Jarrett now. We also have Ryne Robinson and we might see the new guy Goodson at WR at times. And I agree with Joat that Robertson would be a wise signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...