Panthers Pro Days And Private Workouts

[TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam]

What pro days have we attended thus far?

Also, who have we had in for a private workout?

[nickzz]

Name Position Visited Charlotte Interviewed at combine Position coaches attended pro-day Justin Blackmon WR Yes Yes Yes Michael Brockers DT Yes Yes No Michael Floyd WR Yes Yes No Fletcher Cox DT Yes No No Kendall Wright WR Yes Yes Yes Dontari Poe DT Yes No No Stephen Hill WR Yes No Yes Devon Still DT No No No Mohamad Sanu WR No Yes No Jerel Worthy DT Yes Yes No Devon Wylie WR No Yes Yes Brandon Thompson DT No No Yes Joe Adams WR No No Yes Kendall Reyes DT No No No Jarius Wright WR No No No Alameda Ta'amu DT No Yes No Marvin Jones WR No Yes No Jared Crick DT No No Yes Reuben Randle WR Yes Yes No Mike Martin DT No No No

http://www.derp/2012/4/14/2947223/its-not-you-depth-chart-its-me-a-carolina-panthers-wr-tale

[nickzz]

wow that came out completely fuged lol

[CarolinaNCSU]

Name Position Visited Charlotte Interviewed at combine Position coaches attended pro-day

Justin Blackmon WR Yes Yes Yes

Michael Brockers DT Yes Yes No

Michael Floyd WR Yes Yes No

Fletcher Cox DT Yes No No

Kendall Wright WR Yes Yes Yes

Dontari Poe DT Yes No No

Stephen Hill WR Yes No Yes

Devon Still DT No No No

Mohamad Sanu WR No Yes No

Jerel Worthy DT Yes Yes No

Devon Wylie WR No Yes Yes

Brandon Thompson DT No No Yes

Joe Adams WR No No Yes

Kendall Reyes DT No No No

Jarius Wright WR No No No

Alameda Ta'amu DT No Yes No

Marvin Jones WR No Yes No

Jared Crick DT No No Yes

Reuben Randle WR Yes Yes No

Mike Martin DT No No No

http://www.catscratc...anthers-wr-tale

[CarolinaNCSU]

Fixed that for ya...kinda

[TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam]

Thanks man

[panthers55]

That isn't a complete list by any means. If I remember correctly we had Kuechly and Coples in as well off the top of my head. Plus we went to other guy's pro days and talked to a ton of guys at the senior bowl and the combine.

[NCstoner420]

This list was only for defensive tackles and wide receivers, it even says so if you read the actual article. They were making a point that WR may be the position drafted.

[panthers55]

This list was only for defensive tackles and wide receivers, it even says so if you read the actual article. They were making a point that WR may be the position drafted.

SO why only include 2 positions? Seems to me if you want to make a point you need to use context. Sure WR may be drafted along with just about every other position besides center, QB,RB, TE, safety and special teams. Seems a long way to go to say very little.

[NCstoner420]

SO why only include 2 positions? Seems to me if you want to make a point you need to use context. Sure WR may be drafted along with just about every other position besides center, QB,RB, TE, safety and special teams. Seems a long way to go to say very little.

Read the article that was posted along with it first before replying

[panthers55]

Read the article that was posted along with it first before replying

I did twice trying to get the convoluted point. As I said in a much earlier post, when you start an article talking about going to an Australia zoo to see elephants it only will go downhill from there. Mix in some PCP dust in that next bowl and you might see some elephants as well.

[NCstoner420]

I did. Smoke a bowl for further clarity and then reply................

So the writer is writing about the current wide receivers on the roster then he shows how much interest the team has had in the top ten receivers in this years draft. You're expecting him to talk about quarterback, running back, and tight end when it is an article about wide receivers? Then he compares draft visits and such of those top ten receivers with the top ten defensive tackles who in his words, "a position most fans think is dire" or the top position that most fans think the team will pick. The OP who quoted the link failed to realize this as you have so I will smoke a bowl on this fine Sunday afternoon.

[panthers55]

So the writer is writing about the current wide receivers on the roster then he shows how much interest the team has had in the top ten receivers in this years draft. You're expecting him to talk about quarterback, running back, and tight end when it is an article about wide receivers? Then he compares draft visits and such of those top ten receivers with the top ten defensive tackles who in his words, "a position most fans think is dire" or the top position that most fans think the team will pick. The OP who quoted the link failed to realize this as you have so I will smoke a bowl on this fine Sunday afternoon.

And as I said earlier, interest is relative to who else we are looking at and whether we are wanting a receiver or just covering our bases if we decide in the unlikely event we might trade down.

Many fans who know our real needs versus perceived needs and listen to the coaches don't think DT or WR are dire needs.

Since DT is not a dire need but a luxury IMO for a unique talent then comparing WR to DT is a bunny trail unless we discuss corner or DE which are also considered big needs by the team as well. Plus how many WRs are we bringing in who could go in lower rounds or are we only looking at first and second rounders.

The article was incomplete and surely didn't convince me we are likely to go WR. But hey I am sure it is me...................

[NCstoner420]

And as I said earlier, interest is relative to who else we are looking at and whether we are wanting a receiver or just covering our bases if we decide in the unlikely event we might trade down.

Many fans who know our real needs versus perceived needs and listen to the coaches don't think DT or WR are dire needs.

Since DT is not a dire need but a luxury IMO for a unique talent then comparing WR to DT is a bunny trail unless we discuss corner or DE which are also considered big needs by the team as well. Plus how many WRs are we bringing in who could go in lower rounds or are we only looking at first and second rounders.

The article was incomplete and surely didn't convince me we are likely to go WR. But hey I am sure it is me...................

Defensive tackle has been the top position of need on this board all off-season so do not tell me any differently. Go back to my previous posts, you will see that I am in the minority when picking something other than defensive tackle at pick 9. The article was as complete as it needed to be, it had one point and it delivered that point. Wide receiver may or may not be the pick but the article shows stronger interest at receiver than defensive tackle for the top players at their positions.