Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfln Mike Lomardi


Recommended Posts

Was on Cowherd at lunch, kind of seems on the fence about the Saints; thinks if Brees is in the same form they'll be able to repeat last year's performance.... BUT he said that the NFC South is going to be a tough division this year.

Said IF the Panthers hit on their pick and shore up the defense they're going to be very formidable. Stopped short of saying we're the favorite but seemed like he wanted to say that. Maybe 11-5 or 12-4 aren't insane to think about people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just waiting for somebody anybody..any one talking head to be ballzy enough to say it on TV. That they really think we will win the Division.

It's gonna be tough this year, no doubt, but we have an opportunity to keep up the momentum that we built on in the ladder portion of last season and make a statement in the first 5 weeks prior to our week 6 bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather not be talked about. Nobody knows, from today who will win the division. Talk to them in January and we'll see.

that way if you fail then know one really cares.

i can't see any other benefit to people not talking about expecting a lot from the panthers.

the bar has been raised. people will talk and they should and it puts extra needed pressure on the team to succeed.

the days of the panthers being an anonymous team is nearing/has neared it's end. if you want that to happen you've got the wrong QB.

the better this team becomes and the more success this team has, the more they will talk about them. you can't have one without the other.

there's been far too much "flying under the radar" in carolina. it's the team no one has expected to do much because they haven't been able to do much. a team should only ever be "under the radar" for a year at most. more than that and they are just an underachieving disappointment of a team.

i want everyone talking about this team and their QB. i want these guys to be the one that everyone is gunning for and who everyone is hating on because of what they can do. i want this team to be the best and i want them to know it. i want the world to know it. i'm wanting a dynasty that's going to dominate for the next 10 years. would you rather have that or a team that no one is talking about? you can't have both.

for me...i'm going to take the team that is winning and everyone is talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...