Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To The People Crying About Our Defense.


CamNewton1

Recommended Posts

Pass defense does not equal overall defense.

Green Bay had the #2 ranked defense the year they won the Super Bowl. Last year, when their defense regressed? Early exit from the playoffs.

Greenbay got knocked out of the playoffs cause their WRS could not catch a cold in that game cause they was wide open all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they was?

Can we institute a policy were you have to speak English to start a thread?

What football insight you possess. Thanks for sharing.

Can we institute a policy that you have to add substance to the thread or you cannot post?

Why do you care who, why, or how somebody posts? Should we make some of you a panel, and run all thread topics past you?

Grow up, there are more people in the world than just you simplistic snobbies.

Why do people feel the need to share their disappointment to the world. Like they are that important that we all need to be aware they are unhappy. Self centered little prisses.

Irritating. Dippers are irritating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants did have a shitty Defense their pass D was worse than ours but their Offense made up for it Eli Played out of his Mind.

Another Point Greenbay's defense also sucked and thats not hold them back either.

GreenBay (19th) only gave up 22 points a game, and New England (15th) gave up only 21 points per game, the Bengals (9th) up gave up 20 points a game. so from 9th to 19th in total points allowed, the difference was only two points.

My point is that yards allowed a game, should not be the only factor in judging a DEF, the Packers and the Patriots allowed good chunks of yards, but forced teams to punt or attempt FG. Also both teams had several turnovers and held big leads, Greenbay with 38 takeaways and New England with 34, both teams had a very good takeaway/giveaway ratio.

Also you have about 5 teams in the top ten in DEF points allowed that didn't make the playoffs, Browns, Dolphins, PHI, Seahawks, and TENN, with the Jags being at the 11th rankings on DEF points allowed.... all these teams had horrible turnover differentials, Eagles being the worse with -14 and Jags being the best with 5.

Im a little drunk but overall point is, you need a good DEF to get takeaways and prevent scoring, but also you need an offense that doesn't turn the ball over a score, pretty simple... But if your DEF is allowing outrageous amounts of yards, but keeping opponents out of the end zone, they shouldn't considered shitty DEF..... Greenbay, New England, NFC had 5 playoff teams that were ranked in the top 6 in turnover difference, while the AFC had 3 teams in the top 6, so 9 teams out of 16 were ranked in the top 12 in turnover difference, NOT YARDS ALLOWED,

If my Panthers give up 440 yards a game, but we held opponents to 21 points a game, how many games would we have WON this past year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does not really matter if u have a good defense or not really cause in this Era the rules favors the offense and with all these lawsuilts its just gonna get worse. So imo its a waste of time to want a top 5 D cause its not gonna win u poo with the rules like they are Today.

umm, no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
    • I like Morgan's approach but I'll wait for a few winning seasons before giving too much praise.
×
×
  • Create New...