Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing Lesean Mccoy's Contract To D-Will's


heyyall

Recommended Posts

hey ya'll i'm heyyall

did you know we overpaid for deangelo williams

we overpaid for williams. you don't hand a contract like that to a running back.

look at this other running back and what he is paid.

you know who else i don't like? that marty hurney guy. he overpaid for deangelo.

i am heyyall. look, i have paula deen as my avatar. isn't that cool and didn't we overpay for deangelo williams?

did you know that marty hurney sucks? he overpaid deangelo williams. you don't hand that kind of money to a running back. look at this other running back and what he is paid by a general manager that is not marty hurney.

again, i have a paula deen avatar. isn't that funny and doesn't marty hurney suck?

i am heyyall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

23 year old Lesean 5 year 45 million, 20 million guaranteed

28 year old Deangelo 5 year 43 million, 21 million guaranteed

Something doesn't belong.

You don't belong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So 29 is the new 60? DeAngelo is in the prime of his NFL career & at a peak age for a man's physical strength. It's not the NFL of the 90's where the RB is washed up by his 30th birthday. DeAngelo has split carries with Stewart & will prove to be worth his contract. It's a different situation from a Marshall Faulk or Eddie George. DeAngelo hasn't endured the same work load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say they're that far apart. McCoy is really good, putting my homerism aside he's probably better.

He's not better, not by a long shot. He's a back that doesn't split carries, so his numbers are going to be comparable. He's really good, but if their situations were reversed I think Deangelo would have produced a little better. That being said, McCoy deserves a slightly bigger contract than Deangelo because he's a lone back and he's younger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could care less about McCoy's contract, he is a good football player, but how much another team values their players has no affect on how I feel my team values its players.

DWill might seem to be overpaid, but we needed to keep him, and insuring that he will be with us for the long haul, we paid the man, a lot of people were complaining that our owner was cheap, and when he started paying players, everyone complained he was turning into Al Davis... Im happy we locked up DWill, and I'm happy he is happy, he deserved it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCoy led NFL w/ 50 broken tackles, per FB Outsiders. Also 1st w/ 14 runs of 20+ yds. AND played more snaps than any RB.

McCoy ranks third among all running backs with 166 receptions and despite piling up 801 total touches in his career.

He has surrendered just five fumbles (160.2 touches per fumble).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So 28 is the new 60? DeAngelo is in the prime of his NFL career & at a peak age for a man's physical strength. It's not the NFL of the 90's where the RB is washed up by his 30th birthday. DeAngelo has split carries with Stewart & will prove to be worth his contract. It's a different situation from a Marshall Faulk or Eddie George. DeAngelo hasn't endured the same work load.

lol D-will is at his prime, despite not having a 1,000 yard season the past TWO seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey ya'll i'm heyyall

did you know we overpaid for deangelo williams

we overpaid for williams. you don't hand a contract like that to a running back.

look at this other running back and what he is paid.

you know who else i don't like that? that marty hurney guy. he overpaid for deangelo.

i am heyyall. look, i have paula deen as my avatar. isn't that cool and didn't we overpay for deangelo williams?

did you know that marty hurney sucks? he overpaid deangelo williams. you don't hand that kind of money to a running back. look at this other running back and what he is paid by a general manager that is not marty hurney.

again, i have a paula deen avatar. isn't that funny and doesn't marty hurney suck?

i am heyyall

Aww you're so adorable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...