Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore verging on losing his job to another rookie and/or black QB


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Word out of Miami is that Tannehill's got a good chance of securing the no.2 spot, and consistent overachiever David Garrard (from Jersey) is battling it out for the no.1 spot with the the NFL's paragon of mediocrity at the QB position and favorite signal caller among white guys who live in trailers, Matt Moore. The loser of this battle is speculated to be "expendable"

And while the feeling is that Garrard is the odds-on favorite to win the starting job, Moore is doing... other things with his reps...

"4th down, 18 yards to go -- Matt Moore spikes the ball. (Can't believe he did that on fourth down.)"

*Facepalm*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore is far from talent-less.

Everyone thinks that their back up quarterback needs to be able to get them to the the Super Bowl and that's just not going to happen.

Moore would be a great back up for Cam albeit they don't compare very well skill wise and I'd much rather have Jason Campbell, Troy Smith, Tarvaris Jackson, or Vince Young but that's beside the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"To be honest, if the Fins let go of Moore, I'd like to have him back to back up Cam."

"Moore would be a great back up for Cam albeit they don't compare very well skill wise."

"Moore has chemistry with smith, lafell, gettis and threw some nice passes to them in his time here."

These comments are not Smitty approved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...