Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking down Jonathan Stewart's deal


jtnc

Recommended Posts

They have pitiful o-line, soo bad that they wanted mack bernadeau to start(and would have if not injured). Would you take Romo over cam? Demarco Murray and Felix Jones over Stewart and Williams?

Receving cores are about a wash, Dez, Austin, Ogletree, and Witten vs Smith, Lafell,Murphy and Olsen. plus we have a versatile FB in Tolbert.

Gamble would be the best player in their secondary right now, but things are looking up for them with Clairbone and Brandon Carr who just joined. Safeties about a wash at worst. They have Barry church and Gerlad Sensenbaugh.

Demacarus ware is a beast, but aside from him the have connor, sean lee and anthony spencer starting.

Beason,Kuechly, and Anderson are better across the board as a group.

then their d-line is Jason Hatcher(who?)Ratliff, and Spears.

Not very intimidating to me and thankfully we play them this year, so that should be an easy way of deciding who's better.

What about their roster lends you to believe they are better than us? So please tell me how I am wrong with your intelligent claims here.

And just for good measure guess which team has more cap space right now?

http://profootballta...-as-of-july-15/

The WR corp isn't a wash. Dallas has more talent. We have the better number 1, they have the better 1 and 2. Dez also has a ceiling heading toward the future no one on the roster can even compare to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The WR corp isn't a wash. Dallas has more talent. We have the better number 1, they have the better 1 and 2. Dez also has a ceiling heading toward the future no one on the roster can even compare to.

Do you think their roster is better than ours?please save your response until mlp rb can answer for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol "who's jason hatcher"? Who the fug is Greg Hardy outside of Carolina?

also absolutely no mention of Tyron Smith, whom is probably better than Gross at this point, no mention of Mike Jenkins, and I'd take Spencer over Anderson easily. I'd certainly take Ware over anything we've got going on at linebacker. Kenyon Coleman, Jay Ratliff and Marcus Spears have been pretty consistent players over the years. ...Their defensive line is better than ours when you account how well ours plays its role vs theirs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol "who's jason hatcher"? Who the fug is Greg Hardy outside of Carolina?

also absolutely no mention of Tyron Smith, whom is probably better than Gross at this point, no mention of Mike Jenkins, and I'd take Spencer over Anderson easily. I'd certainly take Ware over anything we've got going on at linebacker. Kenyon Coleman, Jay Ratliff and Marcus Spears have been pretty consistent players over the years. ...Their defensive line is better than ours when you account how well ours plays its role vs theirs.

Well Ware shouldn't be compared to our LBs he should be compared to our DEs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol "who's jason hatcher"? Who the fug is Greg Hardy outside of Carolina?

also absolutely no mention of Tyron Smith, whom is probably better than Gross at this point, no mention of Mike Jenkins, and I'd take Spencer over Anderson easily. I'd certainly take Ware over anything we've got going on at linebacker. Kenyon Coleman, Jay Ratliff and Marcus Spears have been pretty consistent players over the years. ...Their defensive line is better than ours when you account how well ours plays its role vs theirs.

So do you think top to bottom thats a better roster? If so please explain. Once again do you dispute Cam is better than Romo? Do you dispute our o-line is far superior to theirs? What about our rb's vs. theirs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok your up, is the cowboys roster better than ours? I already explained why I don't believe so, your turn if you disagree.

Well, I like to look at rosters excluding QBs since it is a QB driven league.

I'd say it is close to a push. I think there is an emphasis on rushing the passer, defending the pass, and being able to throw the ball in this league.....and I think excluding QB they edge us in those aspects

QB factored in, I go Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say their defense is conclusively more talented than ours. On offense, it's give and take depending on position. I'd think Cam is more talented than Romo and I'd rather have him on my roster. Then again, the Cowboys haven't been endowed with a 1st overall pick since they took Maryland.

Listen I don't like Jerruh just like you don't but I'm not going to just go and say we have more talent. I think they've been doing a better job of personnel management than we have. Obviously how well teams manage talent compared to others is fluid and could change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say their defense is conclusively more talented than ours. On offense, it's give and take depending on position. I'd think Cam is more talented than Romo and I'd rather have him on my roster. Then again, the Cowboys haven't been endowed with a 1st overall pick since they took Maryland.

You asked me to name name over half the league in which we have a more talented team, thinking in error that I couldn't. The only team you disputed and said I was talking out of my ass on, is the Cowboys and this your brilliant argument to prove such?

How bout this, just ignore my post from now on, as I will be ignoring yours since we are never going to see eye to eye and at that point it just becomes an exercise in futility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok let's go down the list of every single team you put down then, because coming up with 17 teams that you can conclusively say we're more talented than in like 5 minutes is amateur.

Would you rather make yourself look like an absolute fool who doesn't know when to shut his mouth and accept the fact that he got challenged to elaborate on something of which he was bullshitting about? You've got Hurney's black and blue dildo lodged so far up your ass you can't even name all of the Cowboys' better-known players (let alone role-playing contributors), including one who's been entrenched in trade talks and one who was one of the best rookies last year, on the Cowboys, the team whose name you can't go 20 seconds without hearing on ESPN.

Go ahead, smart guy, next tell us how we're more talented than the Jets.

"uhh okay, um secondary is a push, um because we've got gamble and they've got revis...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...