Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortgage: Fixed 30 years interest rates


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Oh I know... I will pay around 200k in interest over 30 years... So the question is... Should I lock my rate? Whatcha guys think? My close date is Oct 26th.

Yes, lock the rate if you can get below 3.5.

Ask for a 1 time free float down, or at least tell them that another company is offering you one for free.

You can lock at todays price, and if it drops between now and your close date you can change it then for free.

Not all banks will do this but many will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it that you can't or won't? What is the real difference in payments?

If you're locked in to a 30 year, you're almost better off renting.

The difference between a 30-year and 15-year mortgage rate isn't much these days. (0.5%-ish?)

That translates to 30-40 dollars extra on each payment per $100,000 of mortgage to pay a 30-year mortgage off in 15 years versus paying off a 15 year mortgage off on-schedule.

the insurance against losing your job is worth it to me to go with a 30-year over a 15-year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the insurance against loosing ur job u talking about?

He is just saying that if push came to shove he could go back to original lower payment of the 30 year if he were to have a bad month, or lose his job.

Otherwise he would pay extra toward the principle every month and make it act like a 15 year.

Funny thing is though, less than 5% of the country consistently pays more that the mortgage payment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it that you can't or won't? What is the real difference in payments?

If you're locked in to a 30 year, you're almost better off renting.

Disagree, the tax benefits and very low mortgage rates offset that by at least a few hundred dollars per month.

I am not talking house vs. apt, but house vs. equal house on rental market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is just saying that if push came to shove he could go back to original lower payment of the 30 year if he were to have a bad month, or lose his job.

Otherwise he would pay extra toward the principle every month and make it act like a 15 year.

Funny thing is though, less than 5% of the country consistently pays more that the mortgage payment.

I used to be one of the 5%.

Then I had another kid. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can swing a 15 year, rates are better still and costs are significantly reduced over the life of the loan.

Unless you are about 45 years old or older, entering into a 15 year mortgage is not smart. Given the extremely low interest rates on mortgages and the tax dedictiblity factor, you are better off paying a lower payment and investing the incremental amount.

Not to mention that the mortgage tax credit is the primary reason that most Americans are able to itemize their deductions. By having to take the standard dededuction (instead of your itemized deduction with mortgage decuction), you are likely to pay a higher effective tax rate.

Again....30 year mortgage and invest the additional amount that you would have paid on the 15 year mortgage. You will come out better off 99% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine.

What's funny about that is people don't realize how much an extra $50-$100 per month every month toward principle will do for you.

Literally save you tens of thousands of dollars.

But when the effective rate is only about 2% (actual rate minus the impact of it being tax deductible), you are better off investing the additional $100. You are almost guaranteed to earn significantly more than a 2% return over a several year period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you are about 45 years old or older, entering into a 15 year mortgage is not smart. Given the extremely low interest rates on mortgages and the tax dedictiblity factor, you are better off paying a lower payment and investing the incremental amount.

Not to mention that the mortgage tax credit is the primary reason that most Americans are able to itemize their deductions. By having to take the standard dededuction (instead of your itemized deduction with mortgage decuction), you are likely to pay a higher effective tax rate.

Again....30 year mortgage and invest the additional amount that you would have paid on the 15 year mortgage. You will come out better off 99% of the time.

I think Dave Ramsey would thoroughly disagree. :)

And you're assuming that the balance would actually be invested. How often does that actually work out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...