Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OMG Anybody watching PTI?


Delhomeboy

Recommended Posts

Can you catch PTI online? I miss watching Sportscenter and PTI in the evenings.

No ESPN here in Spain.

I'm not really sure...I don't think I could live without it, even if they were little pricks about the nickname issue.

I've always wanted to go to Spain though! I think I'm gonna study abroad there. is it recommendable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're right. Titans had it first. And BTW which on is "Smash" on the Panthers. Neither DWill or Stewart run the ball in a "smash" way.

I wish the whole thing would just go away. Nicknames are stupid anyway. But...they were complete douchebags about it. And I usually like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you want it to go away? People are ACTUALLY talking about the Panthers.

I want them to talk about our record and such. I don't watch Wilbon pontificating with such uninformed bullshit as: OF course THEY SHOULD GIVE BACK THE NICKNAME. IT WAS THERE'S TO BEGIN WITH!!!!!! HOW STUPID FOR THEM TO TAKE IT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking about our god damn nicknames.

And apparently they both think we're in the wrong.

Dumbasses.

what pissed me off was that they acted like what we did was criminal, I didn't know that Lendale and Chris in Tennessee had the nick name until 2 weeks after they got the name, and ESPN didn't know either because they put us down as Smash and Dash all over the screen you would think that they would have been aware if it was well known.

personally I like Double Trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...