Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moron fan base making noise while we are on Offense


savage

Recommended Posts

what the hell? the Panthers fanbase never fails to disappoint me with their stupidity. there were two morons near my seats banging their chairs while we were on OFFENSE. what the fug? has no one explained to people that we make noise on defense and shut up on offense? shouldnt that be common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what the hell? the Panthers fanbase never fails to disappoint me with their stupidity. there were two morons near my seats banging their chairs while we were on OFFENSE. what the fug? has no one explained to people that we make noise on defense and shut up on offense? shouldnt that be common sense.

on 3rd and goal and 4th and goal at the end of the it seamed that half the PANTHER fans where making noise and beating on the the seats when we had the ball.Go figure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt notice much of anybody being that noisy on offense.... maybe on that last series there were some Lets Go Panthers chants. This fan base has nothing to do with today's game, and really it has been pretty miserable at that stadium for us these past 4 years I almost dont even care anymore regarding the fans there. I still do get annoyed when there are so many other teams fans. Today was at least nice we didnt have to hear that. The Dallas game is going to be miserable.... that all being said the fans LEAVING when the Panthers didnt score on that 4th and 1 play was ridiculus. Sure maybe you were expecting the worst, but there was ~3:45 left in the game, and two timeouts. I dont see how you can sit through that game and then get up at that point.

Oh well... I did my yelling at them when they left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw that today in Pittsburgh, they have a big ass flash animation when the steelers are on offenese

"Quiet Please Steelers At Work"

I'm sure thats too offensive to the fan base in Jerry Richardson's opinion

If you get a chance to go to a Panther home game you will see that they post the same thing on the large screen at BOA stadium too. You would know that if you went to the Panthers games.

My point is that more that more the people that post on the CAROLINA HUDDLE have no idea what they are talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you get a chance to go to a Panther home game you will see that they post the same thing on the large screen at BOA stadium too. You would know that if you went to the Panthers games.

My point is that more that more the people that post on the CAROLINA HUDDLE have no idea what they are talking about.

Please bitch i've been going to games since 96, we in no way enforce any type of lowering the level of sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you mean there were actually more panther fans than seahawks fans at the game today?

LOL, it was pretty close. I thought it was funny your fans were making noise on offense though. We really enjoyed the game though (even if the Hawks would have lost) and the Panther fans near us were all pretty cool. In fact it seemed like some of the Hawk fans were being douchey to me. All in all, I'd come back to watch another game here. Your city is cool, your people are cool and your food is good. Good luck Panthers and I hope you can turn it around in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares. They paid to watch a 1-4 team play. They can do whatever they want. I gurantee you, they're not the reason why we loss.

WHO CARES... I care...When you have stupid fans that don't know how to act at a home game when the game is on the line, then they shouldn't be there.

I guess you paid full price for you ticket , you where one of the fans making noise during our last possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...