Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game Grades


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

Offense/OC: A-. Racked up a hell of a lot of yards on the league's best defense in a hostile environment. Chud was a little bit better on his playcalling today.

Defense/DC: A+ for the first three quarters, although it makes me wonder how good Chicago's offense really is. F- for the 4th quarter but not on their bill entirely.

Special Teams: C+. Mixed bag of sorts. Medlock was an A...but the rest of it all was blah. Understand the threat from Hester, but the constant loss of field position was a bit too much. Just shows how bad we are on coverage/etc.

Head Coach: Breaks the scale....Z-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offense/OC: A-. Racked up a hell of a lot of yards on the league's best defense in a hostile environment. Chud was a little bit better on his playcalling today.

Defense/DC: A+ for the first three quarters, although it makes me wonder how good Chicago's offense really is. F- for the 4th quarter but not on their bill entirely.

Special Teams: C+. Mixed bag of sorts. Medlock was an A...but the rest of it all was blah. Understand the threat from Hester, but the constant loss of field position was a bit too much. Just shows how bad we are on coverage/etc.

Head Coach: Breaks the scale....Z-

How can you give the offense an A-? Who cares how many yards we put up the offense didn't get it done. If it wasn't for Louis Murphys miracle recovery all our points would have been off of Medlocks leg. This team, in particular Cams arm, in the redzone is beyond embarrassing. Only aspect of this team to get a good grade should be the Defense. Everything else is an F.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offense/OC: A-. Racked up a hell of a lot of yards on the league's best defense in a hostile environment. Chud was a little bit better on his playcalling today.

Defense/DC: A+ for the first three quarters, although it makes me wonder how good Chicago's offense really is. F- for the 4th quarter but not on their bill entirely.

Special Teams: C+. Mixed bag of sorts. Medlock was an A...but the rest of it all was blah. Understand the threat from Hester, but the constant loss of field position was a bit too much. Just shows how bad we are on coverage/etc.

Head Coach: Breaks the scale....Z-

Thank god somebody recognizes this offense did pretty well against a tough bears D at soldier field

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps A- is a bit too gracious, I'll admit. Compared to last season, this offense is pathetic especially in the red zone. But it was refreshing to see progress from the stagnation of the read-option offense and be able to push the ball against the best D in the NFL on the road and in the windy elements. All things considered, I think they did pretty well... albeit, execution was lacking. If this effort was against a defense like the Titans or the Colts, I'd be calling for Chud's head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll save us time.

Carolina Panthers 2012 season:

Incomplete/Fail.

Hah yea, the Panthers are like a student that came to the first class of the semester, stood up in front of the class and proclaimed to everyone that they were getting an A+ for the year. They proceeded to get a 59% on every test, performing well on the first 3 pages of each exam but totally bombing the final questions. 2012 Panthers get a 59% for the year.

Fail, retake the class next year because you were too stupid to pass it the first time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fans view “box safety” with the same disdain they have when they hear “game manager” QB.   but there’s a reason most 1st round safeties are “box safeties”-it’s a much longer list of requisite skills to be a good box safety than it is to be a guy whose only real responsibility is to not get beat over the top. Fans crave the ed reed type and as someone who has never been able to enjoy this franchise having a guy like that, I get the enthusiasm-but I’m not really prepared to spend a first round pick on a free safety. If it happens it’ll be fun, it’ll address a need with a good player and that’s well and good. But those guys end up walking after their first contract because their pedigree usually outpaces what their teams feel like they’re adding to their overall win total.
    • Its criminal that the upcoming season is mainly in the tiny hands of BY.  I still member the time I did a full turn, if you member his first off-season from that Panthers all-time worst team....... Answering questions at his first presser, he goes along the lines " I didn't do nothing, no weight room or throwing" " I needed to get away". I was fully out with him, the guy didn't even try to improve his football mind, body, strength, in the biggest joke of panther football. I could not believe it, what a leader or dare say "point guard"(lols @ NBA point guards as a ref)
    • I view FS almost as the NT of the secondary. Oftentimes the true measure of his impact isn't necessarily in the plays that he makes but what he allows you to do with the rest of your defense to allow them to make plays. When you have that elite true sideline to sideline FS safety blanket over the top of the defense it allows you to be a lot more aggressive with everyone else. Where as when you have a Nick Scott as your last line of defense you gotta be mindful to not have to rely too heavily on that.
×
×
  • Create New...