Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ok be honest


Asup

Recommended Posts

i wasn't crazy about keyshawn. didn't like carr either.

i tried being optimistic about both, though.

currently really no one (though the barnidge pick kind of bothered me for a little bit but i feel good about it now).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who did u hate when we brougt them in? I feel like a dumbass but i hated the beason pick in the draft .... i didnt know who the hell he was. anyone else wanna come clean?

Honestly, Peppers because the of question of work ethic. Not to mention I don't like the 'Heels. I really wanted Quinton Jammer at the time.

Another was Ryan Kalil. I can't remember who the player was, but I REALLY wanted someone at that spot in the draft. I had no particular beef with Kalil himself though slightly undersized.

I didn't mind the Beason pick, but was sort of shocked that we picked another LB. It immediately hit me though, Morgan was on his way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wasn't crazy about keyshawn. didn't like carr either.

i tried being optimistic about both, though.

currently really no one (though the barnidge pick kind of bothered me for a little bit but i feel good about it now).

Ditto on Keyshawn. I had hope for Carr, but that immediately went down the tubes when I saw him in a live game. Amazing how people can look good in practice when facing no live bullets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didn't like key because he was a self centered punk and didn't like what he could bring to the lockerroom and didn't like carr because i thought he was shell shocked and overrated (which is why he got canned in houston).

what's the problem with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only at the Huddle

I agree, only you could poo on an honest answer. Key was the first person I thought of, didn't like him before he got here and he didn't do anything to change that. But I'm sure you will be posting your unbiased opinion soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Brayton was a total scrub when we got him. I didn't necessarily hate the move though. We needed help there and we got him for cheap. It's one of those moves that if it works, great. If not, oh well you didn't really lose anything.

He has exceeded my expectations to say the least. Just shows that anyone can look bad playing for the Raiders. Even Randy Moss looked mediocre playing there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Brayton was a total scrub when we got him. I didn't necessarily hate the move though. We needed help there and we got him for cheap. It's one of those moves that if it works, great. If not, oh well you didn't really lose anything.

He has exceeded my expectations to say the least. Just shows that anyone can look bad playing for the Raiders. Even Randy Moss looked mediocre playing there.

brayton was one of those guys i could go either way on. wasn't crazy about his lack of production but then i loved the nut cracker on jerramy stevens. i talked to a couple knowledgeable raiders fans who knew a lot about him and felt better about it. they said that he was misused quite a bit there.

i was sold, though, after that smitty/lucas fight. i stayed behind after training camp that day and eavesdropped on the team meeting where he was the first one to speak after fox spoke about how important it was to let it go and not hold any grudges towards either one because he saw first hand what that type of hostility inside the team could do to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, I just about killed myself when they picked Stewart. I felt that they should have taken Branden Albert, but when they traded up for Jeff Otah, I was really excited. about a day after I really though about the Stewart pick and looked at some film on him, I realized that our backfield could be one of the best in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...