Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bwood's way too early mock with no analysis


Bwood

Recommended Posts

Crap, I put a 7th rounder in mine. One website said we didn't and the other said we did. Oh well. Your mock draft, I'd be fine with except I don't know about taking a DE at all.

No one knows yet. It'll be at the end of the season till we know if we lose a 6th or 7th for Murphy. It better be a 7th though with the poo performance he has given us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just watched the Florida game with Luke Joeckel going against DE Dante Fowler jr. and OLB Lerentee McCray. Joeckel had his way against Fowler because that guy is just plain terrible. Fowler needs to bulk up a lot to even begin to have any kind of pass rush, but he's only a freshman. McCray, on the other hand, had a much better pass rush and beat Jockel on a few plays, even to the inside, which shouldn't happen. We'll know more as more recent footage starts to pop up on the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just watched the Florida game with Luke Joeckel going against DE Dante Fowler jr. and OLB Lerentee McCray. Joeckel had his way against Fowler because that guy is just plain terrible. Fowler needs to bulk up a lot to even begin to have any kind of pass rush, but he's only a freshman. McCray, on the other hand, had a much better pass rush and beat Jockel on a few plays, even to the inside, which shouldn't happen. We'll know more as more recent footage starts to pop up on the internet.

i watched that game live, and McCray did have a nice game vs Joeckel. but he has not had a bad game sense than plus he goes up against one of the better pass rushers in practice everyday(Moore). he should get a look this weekend vs Bama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I saidi it's still way too early, most of these picks are just bigger name guys that I like.

It's tough to say where certain guys will go right now, vontaze burfict was a top 15 player in November last year and he went in the 7th?

DT is probably a bigger need over DE with the emergence of our young guns, and the aging of our average DT's.

I also should've noted I expect us to pick up 1 or 2 impact d-linemen/d-back in free agency.

Thanks for the feed back though guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I saidi it's still way too early, most of these picks are just bigger name guys that I like.

It's tough to say where certain guys will go right now, vontaze burfict was a top 15 player in November last year and he went in the 7th?

DT is probably a bigger need over DE with the emergence of our young guns, and the aging of our average DT's.

I also should've noted I expect us to pick up 1 or 2 impact d-linemen/d-back in free agency.

Thanks for the feed back though guys.

While I'll agree that draft positions are constantly in flux, using Vontaze to illustrate this isn't the best example. Vontaze's play had nothing to do with him plummeting down draft boards....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'll agree that draft positions are constantly in flux, using Vontaze to illustrate this isn't the best example. Vontaze's play had nothing to do with him plummeting down draft boards....

He's just the most recent example.

How about jarrett going to us in the second when he was a sure fire first rounder in 07?

Woods is a better player IMO but I think there's always that chance he slips just enough to get picked in the top 5 of the second round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also, just for clarity, is this thread meant for general discussion of Bryce Young, or discussion of General Bryce Young?  
    • The word I feel most comfortable using as a descriptor is "inconsistent". Haven't really seen anyone disagree with that. Consistency being one of the things I value most in a player, that makes me lean toward moving on. But he does still have both time and opportunity to prove otherwise. Mind you, having a streaky quarterback isn't exactly a new thing in Charlotte (you could argue it's been the norm). Delhomme was notorious for starting slow but finishing strong. He could sadly also find hos way into ruts that were difficult to crawl out of. Newton, on the other hand, was often known to start hot but fade late (the vast majority of the 2015 season followed that pattern) though it could be argued that was a team pattern as much as it was Cam's.  There are definitely some fans for whom this is always going to be a bridge too far. (or too short) Realistically, it's not impossible that he could still have a good career even with those issues. It's a damn sight more difficult, though. And arguably, less likely.
    • Oh, I did, and they weren't based in emotions either. Granted, characterizing them that way gives you an easy out to avoid responding to them. Similar tactic to dismissing the other guy's points with "nah, you didn't really watch the games" which saves you having to debate what he said. Strikes me as a kinda lazy way to go, but hey both elements are still back there if you feel up to trying later.
×
×
  • Create New...