Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

As bad as the "O" was...no pick 6 and no punt return TD and it is 22-14


TonyN

Recommended Posts

Your post is sensible but the thread title is ridiculous. If the Broncos didn't score two of their td's then the panthers would have only lost by 8...

If your going to try and polish a turd, don't do it half a**ed. Finish the job.

"If the Broncos didn't return a punt or a pick 6 and scored 8 less points offensively, the game would have went into overtime and the panthers might have won".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as the punt return happened, our morale was gone, and our tails were tucked. Its been the motto of the panthers ever since fox and im tired of it. Defense was on its heels all game didn't put any pressure on manning, and our coverage was the classic bend-but-dont-break. We got lucky on a few dropped passes, and unlucky on a few calls.

As soon as the punt return happened, Chud went all out panic mode and just started slingin pass plays one after another, with a run thrown in sometimes. We didn't stick to our formula and it ended up costing us, much like when we played the giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as the punt return happened, our morale was gone, and our tails were tucked. Its been the motto of the panthers ever since fox and im tired of it. Defense was on its heels all game didn't put any pressure on manning, and our coverage was the classic bend-but-dont-break. We got lucky on a few dropped passes, and unlucky on a few calls.

As soon as the punt return happened, Chud went all out panic mode and just started slingin pass plays one after another, with a run thrown in sometimes. We didn't stick to our formula and it ended up costing us, much like when we played the giants.

I saw Manning moving in the pocket on many occasions in response to Carolina pressure...He 's hard as hell to sack, but you can at least get him out of his comfort zone a little and I thought the Panthers did that pretty well. Actually, Denver was only 3-13 on 3rd down...the defense got off the field quite a bit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Manning moving in the pocket on many occasions in response to Carolina pressure...He 's hard as hell to sack, but you can at least get him out of his comfort zone a little and I thought the Panthers did that pretty well. Actually, Denver was only 3-13 on 3rd down...the defense got off the field quite a bit...

Manning moves in the pocket in anticipation, because he is smart. He's not moving because he HAS to. Cam doesn't even realize there's a whole defensive line coming to sack him. Cam is reactive while Manning is proactive. Denver never needed to do too much on offense after they had the lead and when they did, it was on 1st and 2nd down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...